Baggage Compartment Door Securement Mechanism for VTOL Aircraft

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smaller aircraft, such as VTOLs, face challenges in securely storing baggage due to space constraints and existing solutions often require strenuous lifting, which can be unsafe, especially for large or heavy items, and lack direct securement mechanisms for baggage compartment doors.

Innovation Solution

A baggage storage system with securement mechanisms integrated into the baggage compartment door, such as tiedown straps and binding clips, and sensors to monitor securement status, ensuring stable and unobtrusive storage and proactive detection of unsecured baggage during flight, with safety features to restrict vehicle functionality until all baggage is secured.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If baggage is stored in traditional compartments without integrated securement mechanisms, then storage space is utilized, but securement reliability deteriorates and strenuous lifting is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurement reliabilityVSAvoidease of baggage storage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The securement mechanisms (tiedown straps, binding clips) are merged directly into the baggage compartment door structure. This integration allows baggage to be secured without requiring separate manual tie-down operations or strenuous lifting, as the mechanisms are built-in and readily accessible within the door assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated securement mechanisms serve as intermediaries between the baggage and the compartment door. These mechanisms (straps, clips) provide a direct attachment point that eliminates the need for strenuous manual lifting while ensuring reliable securement through structured engagement points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If securement mechanisms are added to baggage compartment doors, then securement reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurement reliabilityVSAvoiddoor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The securement system is segmented into distinct functional components (tiedown straps, binding clips, sensors) that can be independently integrated into the door assembly. This modular segmentation allows for reliable securement while managing complexity through organized, separable elements rather than a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated securement mechanisms serve multiple functions: they secure baggage, provide structural attachment points, and work with sensors to monitor securement status. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems, thereby managing overall device complexity while improving securement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If manual monitoring of baggage securement is used, then device complexity is low, but safety and reliability deteriorate due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors are integrated into the door system to provide real-time feedback on baggage securement status. This automated feedback mechanism monitors whether baggage is properly secured and can trigger alerts or notifications, eliminating human error while maintaining acceptable system complexity through electronic sensing and communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If baggage compartment door is made accessible for easy retrieval, then ease of operation improves, but securement reliability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of baggage retrievalVSAvoidsecurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The door system incorporates dynamic elements that allow easy access during retrieval operations while maintaining securement reliability during storage. The integrated mechanisms are designed to be easily engaged and disengaged, providing operational flexibility without compromising the securement function when the door is closed and baggage is stored.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240300635A1Baggage access in vehicle and methods thereof
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 SUPERNAL LLC
  • US20240300635A1 patent drawing
  • US20240300635A1 patent drawing
  • US20240300635A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft capable of carrying at least one passenger and at least one baggage item. The aircraft may include: a fuselage comprising a baggage compartment door, wherein the baggage compartment door comprises at least one securement mechanism configured to secure the at least one baggage item to an interior of the baggage compartment door; a wing mechanically coupled to the fuselage; and at least a first and a second primary variable speed rotors configured to provide lift for the fuselage, wherein each of the at least the first and the second primary variable speed rotors are driven by at least one electric motor that is driven by a power source. Other aspects are described and claimed.