Distributed VTOL Ejector Layout for Thrust Balance and Cruise Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing VTOL aircraft face challenges in engine sizing and force balance due to varying thrust requirements during vertical take-off and horizontal flight, leading to inefficient weight distribution and propulsion efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The use of thrust augmenting ejectors and gas generators distributed across the aircraft, combined with shrouded thrusters and box wings, to achieve thrust augmentation ratios exceeding 2:1 to 3:1, allowing for efficient thrust distribution and improved maneuverability and propulsive efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a high thrust-to-weight ratio engine is used to achieve vertical take-off, then vertical lift capability is improved, but engine weight increases and becomes excessive for horizontal cruise flight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust-to-weight ratioVSAvoidengine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system is divided into multiple independent thrust sources: a primary rear engine and multiple distributed ejector thrusters (fore ejectors, aft ejectors, side ejectors). This segmentation allows the primary engine to be sized for cruise efficiency while distributed thrusters provide supplemental thrust for VTOL operations, eliminating the need for a single oversized engine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts thrust distribution between the primary engine and distributed ejectors based on flight phase. During VTOL, all ejectors operate at high power; during cruise, the primary engine provides main thrust while ejectors can be reduced or shut down. This dynamic adaptation optimizes the thrust-to-weight ratio for each operational mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If thrust is concentrated in one location (e.g., rear portion), then engine design is simplified, but aircraft balance and moment control become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine configurationVSAvoidaircraft balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Thrust generation is segmented across multiple locations: fore ejectors at the front, aft ejectors at the rear, and side ejectors distributed laterally. This spatial segmentation of thrust sources enables precise moment control and aircraft balance during VTOL and transition phases, while each individual ejector remains relatively simple in design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different ejector locations provide different local thrust characteristics optimized for their specific functions. Fore ejectors control pitch and forward thrust, aft ejectors control yaw and rearward thrust, and side ejectors control roll and lateral positioning. This local optimization of thrust quality at each position achieves superior overall aircraft balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Force

If thrust augmenting ejectors are distributed across the aircraft, then thrust distribution and balance are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust distributionVSAvoidpropulsion system configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each ejector thruster is designed as a universal multi-functional unit that can provide thrust in multiple directions and serve multiple purposes (lift, forward thrust, balance control). This universality reduces the need for specialized components at each location, thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity despite the distributed configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables aircraft to achieve vertical take-off and landing with reduced runway length, maintain stable hover, and transition to horizontal flight with enhanced propulsive efficiency, achieving thrust levels exceeding the aircraft's weight and reducing specific fuel consumption.

Implementation Method 1

a gas generator (50) producing a fluid stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid stream flow: Fluid Spray

Implementation Method 2

thrust augmenting ejectors and gas generators distributed across the aircraft, combined with shrouded thrusters and box wings, to achieve thrust augmentation ratios exceeding 2:1 to 3:1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust augmentation: Jet

Data Source

PatentUS12589871B2Configuration for vertical take-off and landing system for aerial vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 JETOPTERA INC
  • US12589871B2 patent drawing
  • US12589871B2 patent drawing
  • US12589871B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a main body. A fluid generator is coupled to the main body and produces a fluid stream. At least one tad conduit is fluidly coupled to the generator. First and second fore ejectors are coupled to the main body and respectively coupled to a starboard side and port side of the vehicle. The fore ejectors respectively comprise an outlet structure out of which fluid flows. At least one tail ejector is fluidly coupled to the tail conduit. The tail ejector comprises an outlet structure out of which fluid flows A primary airfoil element includes a closed wing having a leading edge and a trailing edge. The leading and trailing edges of the closed wing define an interior region. The at least one propulsion device is at least partially disposed within the interior region.