VTOL Position Guidance via GUI Objectives and Adaptive Flight Plans

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft face challenges in efficiently positioning above specific locations, especially in urban environments with surrounding obstacles, making the approach difficult.

Innovation Solution

A pilot-controlled position guidance system for VTOL aircraft, incorporating a graphical user interface (GUI) and a guidance controller, allows users to input objectives and receive real-time adjustments to flight plans, utilizing machine learning algorithms and adaptive control methods to adapt to user deviations and external factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional manual positioning methods are used for VTOL aircraft, then pilot control flexibility is maintained, but positioning efficiency and accuracy deteriorate in complex urban environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning efficiencyVSAvoidpilot control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a guidance controller as an intermediary system between the pilot and the VTOL aircraft's flight control. This controller receives pilot input objectives, automatically generates detailed flight plans considering environmental obstacles, and provides real-time guidance commands. This intermediary system resolves the contradiction by automating complex positioning tasks (improving productivity) while maintaining simple pilot interaction through objective-based control (maintaining ease of operation).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the guidance controller monitors aircraft position, compares it with the generated flight plan, and provides real-time corrective guidance. The system also feedbacks guidance quality metrics to the pilot, allowing for adaptive adjustment. This feedback mechanism enables efficient automated positioning while keeping the pilot engaged and in control, resolving the productivity-ease of operation contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If automated flight planning is implemented to improve positioning accuracy, then navigation precision improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidguidance system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guidance system is segmented into distinct functional modules: objective processing module, flight plan generation module, guidance computation module, and display module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the guidance task, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable. This segmentation allows high navigation accuracy through specialized algorithms in each module while organizing system complexity into manageable, modular components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flight plan generation is dynamic and adaptive, automatically adjusting the guidance path based on real-time environmental data and obstacles. The system dynamically recalculates flight plans when conditions change, providing adaptive navigation accuracy. This dynamic approach handles complexity through algorithmic adaptability rather than static complex configurations, resolving the accuracy-complexity contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If real-time flight plan modifications are made to adapt to environmental obstacles, then safety improves, but computational load and response time may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidcomputational response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing environmental data and pre-generating multiple potential flight paths before they are needed. When obstacles are detected, the system can quickly switch to pre-computed alternative paths rather than calculating from scratch. This preliminary preparation maintains high safety through comprehensive obstacle avoidance while reducing real-time computational response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The guidance system changes parameters by adjusting flight plan variables (altitude, speed, path coordinates) in real-time based on obstacle proximity and type. Rather than complete recalculation, the system modifies key parameters of the existing flight plan to achieve safe avoidance maneuvers. This parameter-based adaptation maintains safety while significantly reducing computational response time compared to full replanning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12466552B2Pilot-controlled position guidance for VTOL aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 BETA AIR LLC
  • US12466552B2 patent drawing
  • US12466552B2 patent drawing
  • US12466552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for pilot-controlled position guidance configured for use in a vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft, the system including a VTOL aircraft. The system including a graphical user interface (GUI) coupled to the VTOL aircraft, where the GUI is configured to receive an objective from a user as a function of the user's interaction with the GUI, transmit the objective to a controller, receive a control input from the controller, and display the control input to the user. The system also including a controller where the controller is configured to receive the objective for the GUI, calculate a control input as a function of the objective, and transmit the control input to the GUI.