Manned VTOL Collision Avoidance Using Repulsion Field Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manned vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aerial vehicles face challenges in collision avoidance due to factors like high-speed collisions, poor visibility, and pilot error, especially in high-density airspace where multiple vehicles occupy similar flight paths, increasing the risk of accidents with objects or other vehicles.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a control system in VTOL aerial vehicles that includes a sensing system, processor, and memory to determine state estimates, generate repulsion potential field models, and calculate control vectors to avoid collisions by adjusting propulsion based on collision avoidance velocity vectors and input vectors from pilot-operable controls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a control system with sensing system and processor is implemented to determine state estimates and generate control vectors, then collision avoidance capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional modules: sensing system for data acquisition, processor for state estimation and collision avoidance velocity vector calculation, and actuation system for propulsion control. This modular segmentation improves reliability by isolating functions while managing complexity through structured organization of system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary determination of state estimates and collision avoidance velocity vectors before actual collision occurs. The processor continuously calculates potential collision scenarios and prepares control vectors in advance, enabling proactive collision avoidance rather than reactive response, thereby improving safety without requiring overly complex real-time intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If collision avoidance velocity vector calculation is performed based on state estimates, then navigation precision is improved, but computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates collision avoidance velocity vectors based on partial state estimates rather than complete exhaustive analysis. By focusing computation on critical state parameters directly related to collision risk (position, velocity, object proximity) rather than all possible state variables, the system achieves sufficient navigation precision while reducing computation time to acceptable levels for real-time operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where state estimates are updated based on sensor measurements and previous control actions. This feedback mechanism allows the processor to refine collision avoidance velocity vector calculations iteratively, improving accuracy over time while maintaining efficient computation through incremental updates rather than complete recalculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If repulsion potential field model is generated from sensor data, then obstacle detection accuracy is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The repulsion potential field model serves as an intermediary representation between raw sensor data and collision avoidance control. Instead of directly processing complex sensor data for obstacle detection, the system transforms data into a potential field model where obstacles generate repulsion forces. This intermediary model simplifies subsequent collision avoidance calculations while maintaining high detection accuracy, as the field model encapsulates obstacle information in a computationally efficient format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240395154A1Collision avoidance for manned vertical take-off and landing aerial vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 ALAUDA AERONAUTICS PTY LTD
  • US20240395154A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395154A1 patent drawing
  • US20240395154A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A manned vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aerial vehicle comprises: a body comprising a cockpit having pilot-operable controls; a propulsion system carried by the body to propel the body during flight; a control system comprising a sensing system, a processor, and memory storing program instructions configured to cause the processor to determine a state estimate of the aerial vehicle within a region, a repulsion vector based on a repulsion potential field model of the region and the state estimate, and a collision avoidance velocity vector based on the repulsion vector and the state estimate; determine an input vector indicative of an intended angular velocity and an intended thrust of the vehicle based on pilot-operable control inputs; determine a control vector based on the collision avoidance velocity vector and the input vector; and control the propulsion system such that the manned VTOL aerial vehicle avoids an object in the region.