VTOL Route Coordination for Urban Noise-Aware Air Mobility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Intra-city air travel is limited due to resource requirements, noise pollution, and operational challenges, making it difficult to integrate into urban transport networks effectively.

Innovation Solution

A transport network coordination system that uses VTOL aircraft, incorporating onboard and offboard sensing, network data, and predictive noise mitigation to optimize routes and reduce noise impact, leveraging electric VTOL technology and distributed sensor arrays for real-time noise management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If VTOL aircraft are deployed for intra-city transport, then travel time is reduced and transport efficiency is improved, but noise pollution increases and public acceptance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport efficiencyVSAvoidnoise pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts aircraft routing in real-time based on noise sensitivity data, weather conditions, and network state. Routes are not fixed but adapt continuously to minimize noise impact on sensitive areas while maintaining transport efficiency. This dynamic optimization allows the system to balance productivity gains with noise mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as flight paths, altitudes, and timing based on real-time conditions. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system can route aircraft away from noise-sensitive areas during peak sensitivity periods while maintaining overall transport productivity. Weather conditions and network state serve as triggers for parameter adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If dynamic routing optimization is implemented, then noise mitigation is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise impactVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops where noise sensitivity data, weather updates, and aircraft location information are constantly monitored and fed back into the routing optimization algorithm. This feedback mechanism enables automated real-time adjustments without requiring complex manual intervention, balancing noise mitigation with manageable system complexity through closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components such as centralized coordination servers and standardized data interfaces that mediate between multiple aircraft, noise sensitivity zones, and weather data sources. These intermediaries simplify the overall system architecture by centralizing complex optimization logic and providing standardized communication protocols, thereby reducing distributed system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If real-time noise monitoring and route adjustment are implemented, then noise pollution is reduced, but computational requirements and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise pollutionVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial optimization by focusing computational resources on the most critical routing decisions and noise-sensitive areas rather than optimizing every possible parameter continuously. By identifying and prioritizing key optimization targets, the system achieves effective noise mitigation while reducing overall computational energy requirements through selective rather than exhaustive optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12057021B2Dynamic aircraft routing
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 JOBY AERO INC
  • US12057021B2 patent drawing
  • US12057021B2 patent drawing
  • US12057021B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A request for transport services that identifies a rider, an origin, and a destination is received from a client device. Eligibility of the request to be serviced by a vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft is determined based on the origin and the destination. A transportation system determines a first and a second hub for a leg of the transport request serviced by the VTOL aircraft and calculates a set of candidate routes from the first hub to the second hub. A provisioned route is selected from among the set of candidate routes based on network and environmental parameters and objectives including pre-determined acceptable noise levels, weather, and the presence and planned routes of other VTOL aircrafts along each of the candidate routes.