VTOL Aircraft Static Puller and Pusher Rotor Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional VTOL aircraft face limitations in range and speed due to the need for rotor tilting between vertical and horizontal flight modes, which complicates the design and reduces efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The use of a combination of static puller and pusher rotors allows for transition between vertical and horizontal flight without tilting, maintaining a fixed rotor orientation relative to the wings and fuselage, enabling efficient and stable flight transitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If rotor tilting mechanisms are used to transition between vertical and horizontal flight, then the aircraft can achieve VTOL capability, but the device complexity increases and flight efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVTOL capabilityVSAvoid rotor tilting mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aircraft is divided into separate functional modules: fixed puller rotors at the front for forward thrust, fixed pusher rotors at the rear for backward thrust, and independent tilt-wings for attitude control. This segmentation eliminates the need for complex rotor tilting mechanisms while maintaining VTOL capability through differential thrust control from multiple rotor groups

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of tilting the rotors to change flight mode, the invention inverts the approach by keeping rotors fixed and tilting the wings/body of the aircraft. The puller and pusher rotors remain stationary relative to the fuselage, while the wings are tilted to achieve vertical or horizontal flight orientation, thereby reducing mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Adaptability or versatility

If rotor tilting mechanisms are used for flight mode transition, then VTOL capability is achieved, but flight speed and range are severely limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight mode transition capabilityVSAvoidflight speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system is segmented into multiple independent rotor groups (puller rotors and pusher rotors) that can operate simultaneously. This allows the aircraft to achieve high-speed horizontal flight by engaging only the puller rotors in airplane mode, while reserve thrust capacity from pusher rotors enables rapid acceleration and enhanced top speed compared to conventional helicopter designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The aircraft employs dynamic control of multiple rotor thrust vectors to optimize performance for different flight modes. During horizontal flight, the system dynamically adjusts the contribution of puller versus pusher rotors to maintain optimal speed and efficiency, enabling sustained high-speed flight that overcomes the speed limitations of traditional VTOL aircraft

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If rotor tilting mechanisms are used, then flight mode transition is possible, but energy consumption increases and flight duration decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight mode transition capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system is divided into multiple independent rotor groups that can operate independently or in combination. This segmentation allows the aircraft to optimize energy consumption by engaging only the necessary rotors for the current flight mode, reducing overall power demand and extending flight duration compared to systems that require all rotors to tilt and operate simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flight control system dynamically optimizes the distribution of thrust among puller and pusher rotors based on flight phase and energy availability. This dynamic load management reduces peak power consumption during transitions and maintains efficient operating points during sustained flight, thereby extending operational duration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances flight efficiency, reduces drag, and allows for longer-duration flights by eliminating the need for complex rotor tilting mechanisms, while maintaining stability and balance throughout various flight modes.

Implementation Method 1

The rotors remain in a fixed orientation relative to the wings and fuselage of the VTOL aircraft, while being able to transition the aircraft from a substantially vertical flight path to a substantially horizontal flight path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentEP3057867B1Vertical take-off and landing aircraft
Publication Date: 2018.08.29 SWIFT ENG INC
  • EP3057867B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3057867B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3057867B1 patent drawingFigure 5~8

AI summary

A VTOL aircraft includes at least one puller rotor and at least one pusher rotor. The VTOL aircraft, for example, may include three puller rotors and one pusher rotor. The combination of static puller and pusher rotors allows the rotors to remain in a fixed orientation (i.e., no moving mechanical axes are required) relative to the wings and fuselage of the VTOL aircraft, while being able to transition the aircraft from a substantially vertical flight path to a substantially horizontal flight path.