VTOL Aircraft Yaw Control via Thrust Vectoring and Coaxial Propellers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hybrid tail-sitter aircraft face instability in hover, sensitivity to wind gusts, and yaw control issues due to high aspect ratio wings and complex control surface configurations, which limit their practicality and safety for various applications.

Innovation Solution

Aircraft design featuring coaxial counter-rotating propellers, elevons for pitch and roll control, and a thrust-vectoring system with fixed fins for yaw control, reducing the number of control surfaces and eliminating the need for bulky fuselage and rudders, allowing for stable operation and efficient use in cluttered environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If high aspect ratio wings are used, then lift efficiency is improved, but gust sensitivity and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift efficiencyVSAvoidhover stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic control system with multiple independently controlled rotors that can adjust their rotational speeds in real-time. This dynamic adjustment allows the aircraft to maintain stability in hover by compensating for gusts and disturbances, resolving the contradiction between using high aspect ratio wings for lift efficiency and maintaining hover stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system changes operational parameters (rotor speeds) to maintain stability. By independently varying the rotational speed of each rotor, the system can counteract gust-induced disturbances and maintain stable hover despite using high aspect ratio wings that are inherently more gust-sensitive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If complex control surface configurations are used, then control authority is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol authorityVSAvoidcontrol surface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the yaw control function from traditional complex control surfaces (rudders, differential tail rotor) and implements it through a simplified thrust-vectoring system using fixed fins combined with differential thrust from the main rotors. This reduces control surface complexity while maintaining adequate control authority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The main rotors serve multiple functions: they provide lift, enable pitch and roll control through differential speed adjustment, and contribute to yaw control through coordinated differential thrust. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate complex control surfaces, simplifying the overall control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If bulky fuselage and rudders are used, then yaw stability is improved, but weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyaw stabilityVSAvoidaircraft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the yaw stability function from the traditional bulky fuselage and rudder configuration and implements it through a compact thrust-vectoring system using fixed fins positioned in the slipstream. This approach provides adequate yaw stability without the weight and complexity of traditional solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical rudder system with a thrust-vectoring approach where differential rotor thrust provides yaw control authority. This substitution eliminates the need for large moving rudder surfaces and complex hinge mechanisms, reducing weight and complexity while maintaining yaw stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If single propeller configuration is used, then simplicity is improved, but yaw control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropeller configuration simplicityVSAvoidyaw control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the propulsion system into multiple independently controlled rotors instead of using a single propeller. This segmentation enables differential thrust control, providing yaw authority while maintaining relative simplicity in the overall configuration. The fixed fins work in conjunction with the segmented propulsion to enhance yaw control without requiring complex movable control surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances stability and control during hover and vertical takeoff/landing, reduces weight and complexity, and enables safe operation in moderate winds and cluttered spaces, making it suitable for diverse applications including urban and indoor use.

Implementation Method 1

coaxial counter-rotating propellers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounter-rotation:

Implementation Method 2

The two distant motors and propellers help to increase roll-inertia for increased roll stability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque cancellation:

Implementation Method 3

The single slipstream induces yawing moment as the slipstream strikes a vertical stabilizer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSlipstream:

Implementation Method 4

elevons for pitch and roll control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 5

Elevons are used instead of ailerons+an elevator, which reduces the total number of control surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectControl surface deflection:

Implementation Method 6

a thrust-vectoring system with fixed fins for yaw control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust vectoring:

Implementation Method 7

The thruster (2) rotates about the hinge axis (116) to vector thrust for aircraft yaw control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic force generation: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 8

The thruster (2) rotates about the hinge axis (116) to vector thrust for aircraft yaw control

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust vectoring:

Implementation Method 9

The mount (8) has at least one thruster (2) attached. The thruster (2) rotates about the hinge axis (116)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational motion:

Data Source

PatentUS11577827B2YAW-enhancing attitude control system for VTOL fixed-wing aircraft
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 QINGDAO RANDALL AERODYNAMICS ENG LLC
  • US11577827B2 patent drawing
  • US11577827B2 patent drawing
  • US11577827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An unmanned aircraft capable of vertical takeoff, vertical landing, and/or flight in a hovering orientation is presented; its fixed-wing is positively-swept and of low aspect-ratio with suitable airfoils. The unmanned aircraft includes a thruster comprising two contra-rotating motors and propellers forward of the fixed-wing's leading-edge and a rudderless fin aft of the center-of-mass, all of which lie on the aircraft's plane-of-symmetry. Two elevons provide pitch and roll control. The unmanned aircraft can stand upright on its feet.A control system for aircraft with at least one wing is also presented. The control system includes a mount and attached thruster which lie on the plane-of-symmetry forward of the fixed-wing's leading-edge. A hinge axis approximately perpendicular to the aircraft's horizontal plane passes through the mount. The thruster rotates about the hinge axis for aircraft yaw control.