Non-Matrix Vug Validation With Scaled Resistivity Logs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for interpreting vugs in subterranean rocks are unreliable, leading to inaccurate wellbore path planning and inefficient reservoir fluid flow simulations.

Innovation Solution

A method involving obtaining well logs, including a validating resistivity log, to produce an initial vug interpretation log, determine a scaled resistivity log, and validate the vug interpretation using a ratio-based approach, followed by a reservoir fluid flow simulation to improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current methods of vug interpretation are used, then the process is simple, but the reliability of vug identification is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of vug identificationVSAvoidcomplexity of interpretation method
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary scaling of resistivity log data and preliminary vug interpretation before final validation. By pre-processing the resistivity data to account for borehole conditions and rock properties, the system establishes a reliable baseline for subsequent vug identification, improving accuracy while maintaining systematic complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses validating resistivity logs to feedback and verify the initial vug interpretation. The scaled resistivity data is compared against the initial interpretation to confirm or reject vug predictions, creating a closed-loop validation process that significantly improves reliability through self-verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 3:

The interpretation process is divided into distinct segments: obtaining raw well logs, producing initial vug interpretation, determining scaled resistivity logs, and validating results. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If current vug interpretation methods are used, then the workflow is fast, but the accuracy of wellbore path planning is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of wellbore path planningVSAvoidtime for validation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scaling of resistivity data and preliminary vug interpretation before final validation. By pre-processing the resistivity data to account for borehole conditions and rock properties, the system establishes a reliable baseline for subsequent vug identification, improving accuracy while maintaining systematic complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation process focuses on critical zones where vugs are most likely to occur or where wellbore path planning is most sensitive. Rather than validating every segment uniformly, the system applies enhanced validation selectively to high-risk or high-value intervals, achieving high accuracy where needed while minimizing unnecessary validation time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If current vug interpretation methods are used, then the process is straightforward, but the reservoir fluid flow simulation results are inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of reservoir simulationVSAvoidcomplexity of interpretation method
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses scaled resistivity logs to feedback and verify the initial vug interpretation. The validation process compares expected resistivity responses with actual measurements, allowing the system to confirm or reject vug predictions with high confidence, thereby ensuring accurate input data for reservoir simulations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The interpretation process is divided into distinct segments: obtaining raw well logs, producing initial vug interpretation, determining scaled resistivity logs, and validating results. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12450406B2Method for validating non-matrix vug features in subterranean rocks
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US12450406B2 patent drawing
  • US12450406B2 patent drawing
  • US12450406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining a validated vug interpretation log for performing a reservoir fluid flow simulation is disclosed. The method including obtaining a set of well logs from a wellbore, where at least one of the set of well logs may be used as a validating resistivity log, producing an initial vug interpretation log based on at least one of the well logs, and determining a scaled resistivity log from the validating resistivity log The method further includes determining a validated vug interpretation log based, at least in part, on the scaled resistivity log and the initial vug interpretation log; and performing a reservoir fluid flow simulation based, at least in part, on the validated vug interpretation log.