Vulnerability Proofed Cluster Management via Remote Access Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Information Handling Systems (IHSs) in data centers often become vulnerable due to inconsistent and unaware configurations, leading to security and functional vulnerabilities, despite updates intended to address these issues, as administrators may not be aware of publicly known vulnerabilities.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a remote access controller within IHSs that monitors configurations, retrieves vulnerability proofing requirements, and suspends participation in a computing cluster if vulnerabilities are detected, using catalogs of known vulnerabilities and factory-provisioned identity certificates to ensure secure configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If administrators manually configure IHS hardware and software components, then system adaptability and customization are improved, but system reliability deteriorates due to unknown vulnerabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration flexibilityVSAvoidvulnerability susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where configuration changes are continuously monitored, scanned for vulnerabilities against known catalogs, and automatically rejected or alerted if vulnerabilities are detected. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures that administrative flexibility is maintained while reliability is preserved through automated vulnerability detection and prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary vulnerability management system is introduced between the administrator and the IHS configuration process. This intermediary automatically scans configuration changes against vulnerability catalogs, acts as a gatekeeper to prevent vulnerable configurations from being applied, and provides automated alerts and remediation guidance, thus resolving the contradiction between administrative freedom and system security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If frequent hardware and software updates are performed, then system functionality is improved, but vulnerability introduction increases due to inconsistent configuration protocols

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupdate frequencyVSAvoidconfiguration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary vulnerability scanning and validation before configuration updates are applied. By proactively checking against vulnerability catalogs and validating configuration changes beforehand, the system prevents vulnerable configurations from being introduced, thus maintaining both high update frequency and configuration consistency without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If comprehensive vulnerability scanning is performed on all configurations, then system security is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity assuranceVSAvoidconfiguration processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial scanning by focusing vulnerability checks only on critical components and high-risk configuration changes rather than performing exhaustive scans on every configuration parameter. This selective approach maintains strong security assurance for the most vulnerable areas while significantly reducing processing time and minimizing impact on configuration operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12137112B2Systems and methods for vulnerability proofed cluster management
Publication Date: 2024.11.05 DELL PROD LP
  • US12137112B2 patent drawing
  • US12137112B2 patent drawing
  • US12137112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for vulnerability proofing the use of an IHS (Information Handling System) in a computing cluster. Notification is received by the IHS of modifications to configurations of a computing cluster that includes the IHS. Vulnerability proofing requirements for computing cluster configurations including the IHS are retrieved from a persistent data storage of the IHS. Based on the vulnerability proofing requirements, catalogs comprising known vulnerabilities of IHS hardware components are accessed. Modifications to the computing cluster configurations are identified as vulnerable in one or more of the catalogs. When modifications to the computing cluster configurations are identified as vulnerable, participation by the IHS in the computing cluster is suspended until the modifications to the computing cluster configurations are changed to include no configurations with vulnerabilities identified in the catalogs.