Wafer Defect Detection Using Base Pattern Fingerprint Data
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing defect detection techniques for semiconductor structures on wafers, such as D2DB defect detection, are error-prone, time-consuming, and require significant manual efforts, and are not process or imaging modality stable, often failing to accurately compare microscopic images with CAD layouts due to missing fabrication and imaging modality features.
Innovation Solution
A method using fingerprint data for base pattern classes associated with semiconductor structures, which allows for accurate defect detection without the need for mapping between microscopic images and CAD layouts, by obtaining and comparing fingerprint data from a database with microscopic images, and populating a database with fingerprint data for each base pattern class to facilitate defect detection.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If a direct comparison between microscopic images and CAD layout is performed, then the defect detection process is simple, but the accuracy is poor due to missing fabrication and imaging modality features
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an intermediary approach by using base pattern classes as mediators between the CAD layout and microscopic images. Instead of directly comparing the detailed microscopic images with the simplified CAD layout, the system first extracts base pattern classes from the CAD layout and compares these abstracted patterns with corresponding regions in the microscopic images. This intermediary layer captures essential structural information while filtering out irrelevant fabrication-specific details, thereby improving detection accuracy without requiring complex direct comparison algorithms.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent segments the semiconductor structure into base pattern classes, which are fundamental repeating units or motifs. By dividing the complex semiconductor structure into these basic building blocks, the system can compare only the essential pattern information rather than processing the entire detailed microscopic image against the entire CAD layout. This segmentation reduces the comparison complexity while maintaining the ability to detect defects in the segmented pattern elements.
2Measurement precision
If synthetic microscopic image generation based on CAD layout is performed, then the comparison can account for fabrication features, but the process becomes difficult and error-prone due to lack of detailed process knowledge
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts only the essential base pattern classes from the CAD layout, separating the critical structural information from the detailed fabrication process parameters. By taking out just the base pattern information rather than attempting to generate a complete synthetic image, the system avoids the complexity of simulating every fabrication step while still capturing the essential structural features needed for accurate defect detection.
Solution Approach 2:
Instead of generating a synthetic microscopic image from the CAD layout by simulating fabrication processes (the conventional approach), the patent inverts the approach by extracting base pattern classes from the CAD layout and using these abstracted patterns as the reference for comparison. This inversion eliminates the need for complex synthetic image generation while maintaining the ability to account for fabrication features through the base pattern class extraction process.
3Adaptability or versatility
If manual mapping between microscopic images and CAD layout is performed, then the comparison can be adapted to process variations, but the process becomes time-consuming and requires significant manual effort
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary action by pre-extracting base pattern classes from the CAD layout before the actual defect detection process. These base pattern classes are prepared in advance and stored as reference data. During the defect detection phase, the system simply needs to compare the base pattern classes with corresponding regions in the microscopic images, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual mapping during the actual inspection process.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a simplified copy or representation of the CAD layout in the form of base pattern classes. These base pattern class copies capture the essential structural information without the complexity of the full CAD layout or the variability of manual mapping. The system then compares these standardized base pattern class copies with the microscopic images, providing a consistent and efficient comparison process that adapts to process variations without requiring manual intervention.
Data Source
AI summary
A method of a defect detection of a plurality of semiconductor structures arranged on a wafer includes obtaining a microscopic image of the wafer. The microscopic image depicts the plurality of semiconductor structures. The method also includes obtaining, from a database, fingerprint data for each base pattern class of a set of base pattern classes associated with respective one or more semiconductor structures of the plurality of semiconductor structures. The method further includes performing the defect detection based on the fingerprint data and the microscopic image.


