Wafer Defect Classification Using Autoencoder Feature Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wafer defect detection methods face performance issues due to high-dimensional data and high computational complexity in large-scale datasets, leading to inefficiencies in semiconductor fabrication.

Innovation Solution

An inspection system utilizing a classification convolutional neural network (CNN) with an encoder and decoder, combined with clustering, to capture and classify wafer images, automatically extracting features and generating soft labels for improved defect detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional image classification methods are used for wafer defect detection, then defect types can be identified, but performance deteriorates due to high-dimensional data and high computational complexity on large-scale datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most salient features from wafer images using a trained neural network model, rather than processing all high-dimensional pixel data. The feature extraction network identifies and outputs only the critical defect-related features, significantly reducing the data dimensionality while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the defect detection task into two distinct stages: (1) feature extraction using a trained neural network to identify salient defect features, and (2) classification using a simpler classifier on the extracted features. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, reducing overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If conventional image classification methods with multiple training images are used, then classifier performance can be improved, but processing time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidtraining and processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary feature extraction and selection during the training phase, creating a compact representation of defect features that can be quickly processed during inspection. The neural network is pre-trained to recognize salient features, so during actual defect detection, only the extracted features need to be classified, not the entire high-dimensional images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified copy of the defect detection problem by extracting essential features that capture the critical information needed for classification. Instead of working with full-resolution images, the system works with a compressed feature representation that preserves defect characteristics while reducing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If high-dimensional wafer image data is processed in detail, then defect detection precision can be maintained, but productivity decreases due to high computational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection precisionVSAvoidwafer inspection throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the salient defect features from full wafer images, discarding redundant information. This feature extraction process maintains detection precision by focusing on critical defect characteristics while reducing the data volume that requires detailed processing, thereby increasing inspection throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the problem from processing high-dimensional pixel data to processing low-dimensional feature vectors. By changing the parameter representation from raw image pixels to extracted feature values, the system achieves the same detection precision with significantly reduced computational requirements, enabling higher productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11922613B2Apparatuses and methods for determining wafer defects
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11922613B2 patent drawing
  • US11922613B2 patent drawing
  • US11922613B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inspection system for determining wafer defects in semiconductor fabrication may include an image capturing device to capture a wafer image and a classification convolutional neural network (CNN) to determine a classification from a plurality of classes for the captured image. Each of the plurality of classes indicates a type of a defect in the wafer. The system may also include an encoder to encode to convert a training image into a feature vector; a cluster system to cluster the feature vector to generate soft labels for the training image; and a decoder to decode the feature vector into a re-generated image. The system may also include a classification system to determine a classification from the plurality of classes for the training image. The encoder and decoder may be formed from a CNN autoencoder. The classification CNN and the CNN autoencoder may each be a deep neural network.