Semiconductor Wafer Defect Diagnosis Using Multi-Image Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In semiconductor manufacturing, existing inspection methods fail to accurately detect defects in wafers as dimensions decrease, leading to quality and reliability issues due to smaller defects causing aberrations and yield losses.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an inspection apparatus that captures multiple raw images from semiconductor wafers using GDS files, performs first and second image-based comparisons to detect and classify defects, utilizing a reference image from a golden wafer or die to verify and diagnose defects, thereby improving defect detection accuracy and reducing tooling time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing inspection methods are used, then manufacturing process is simple, but defect detection accuracy deteriorates as dimensions decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection method is divided into multiple sequential stages: obtaining reference images from golden wafers, capturing raw images of production wafers, performing first image-based comparison to detect differences, and conducting second image-based comparison to classify defect types. This segmentation allows each stage to focus on specific detection tasks, improving overall accuracy without overwhelming complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reference images are obtained from golden wafers before inspection begins. These reference images serve as baseline standards for comparison, allowing the system to pre-establish what constitutes normal versus defective patterns. This preliminary action enables more accurate defect detection during subsequent inspections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple image comparisons are performed, then defect detection accuracy improves, but inspection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The comparison process is segmented into two distinct phases: first image-based comparison for detecting image differences, and second image-based comparison for classifying defect types. This segmentation allows the system to perform comprehensive analysis while organizing operations efficiently, reducing unnecessary processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs comparisons on specific regions of interest identified through the first comparison, rather than analyzing entire wafer surfaces uniformly. By focusing computational resources on areas showing differences, the system achieves high accuracy while minimizing total inspection time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If reference images from golden wafers are used, then defect classification accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect classification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Reference images are obtained by capturing images from golden wafers that represent defect-free or known-good standards. These copied reference images are stored and used for comparison against production wafers, providing an accurate baseline without requiring complex real-time reference generation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Golden wafers are prepared and reference images are captured in advance, before the actual inspection process begins. This preliminary preparation creates a library of reference standards that simplifies the main inspection system, as it only needs to compare against pre-established references rather than generate them dynamically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12062166B2Method and system for diagnosing a semiconductor wafer
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US12062166B2 patent drawing
  • US12062166B2 patent drawing
  • US12062166B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for diagnosing a semiconductor wafer are provided. A plurality of raw images are captured with a tilt angle from the semiconductor wafer according to graphic data system (GDS) information regarding a layout of a target die, by an inspection apparatus. A first image-based comparison is performed on the plurality of raw images, by a determining circuitry, to obtain a defect image in the plurality of raw images. A second image-based comparison is performed on a reference image and the defect image, so as to classify a defect type of an image difference in the defect image, by the determining circuitry. The number of the plurality of raw images is greater than 2.