Semiconductor Process Correction via Sparse-to-Dense Fingerprint Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor manufacturing processes face challenges in accurately modeling and controlling Critical Dimension (CD) and overlay performance due to sparse data representation, leading to sub-optimal corrections and inefficient throughput, as sparse-to-dense data mismatches result in poor fingerprint descriptions and erratic behavior across different wafers and lots.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced that involves obtaining both sparse and dense data sets, applying a model to determine sparse-to-dense mismatches, adapting the model based on these mismatches, and using the adapted model to determine corrections, thereby improving process control and reducing the need for frequent dense data sampling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If sparse data sampling is used for process monitoring, then measurement time and complexity are reduced, but measurement precision and model accuracy deteriorate due to sparse-to-dense mismatches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement timeVSAvoidmodel accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a transfer learning framework where a model trained on dense data serves as an intermediary to enable accurate predictions from sparse data. The pre-trained model captures complex patterns from comprehensive datasets, then adapts to sparse measurement scenarios, bridging the gap between sparse sampling efficiency and dense data accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts model parameters through transfer learning, adapting the model's internal representations based on the available data density. By changing parameters learned from dense data and fine-tuning them with sparse data, the system maintains high measurement precision while operating under sparse sampling conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If dense data sampling is used for accurate process control, then measurement precision improves, but productivity decreases due to increased measurement frequency requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefingerprint description accuracyVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using sparse sampling (less than full dense sampling) combined with transfer learning to achieve sufficient model accuracy. Instead of requiring complete dense data coverage, the system uses partial data with enhanced processing through pre-trained models, maintaining acceptable precision while improving throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If sparse data is used for process correction, then throughput is improved by reducing measurement frequency, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to poor fingerprint descriptions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidcorrection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training models on dense data before deployment. This advance preparation creates a robust foundation that enables accurate process corrections even when only sparse data is available during actual operation, ensuring manufacturing precision is maintained despite reduced measurement frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If model adaptation based on dense data is performed frequently, then manufacturing precision improves, but loss of time increases due to frequent retraining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoidretraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by retraining models at optimized intervals rather than continuously. Transfer learning enables the system to maintain accuracy with less frequent retraining compared to traditional approaches, as the pre-trained model provides a robust starting point that requires fewer updates to adapt to process variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11086305B2Determining a correction to a process
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US11086305B2 patent drawing
  • US11086305B2 patent drawing
  • US11086305B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for configuring a semiconductor manufacturing process, the method including: obtaining a first value of a first parameter based on measurements associated with a first operation of a process step in the semiconductor manufacturing process and a first sampling scheme; using a recurrent neural network to determine a predicted value of the first parameter based on the first value; and using the predicted value of the first parameter in configuring a subsequent operation of the process step in the semiconductor manufacturing process.