Semiconductor Wafer Implantation for Uniform Defect-Controlled Doping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for semiconductor wafer doping using ion implantation face challenges such as mechanical complexity due to rotational and oscillating movements, mechanical stresses and particle contamination of the energy filter, and the generation of point defects in semiconductor materials, particularly in SiC, which affect the precision and reproducibility of doping profiles.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves a semiconductor wafer processing system where the energy filter is positioned in a separate vacuum-sealable unit to minimize mechanical vibrations and particle exposure, with synchronized electrostatic deflection of the ion beam and mechanical movement of the filter to achieve homogeneous irradiation, and the use of a heatable wafer chuck to reduce point defect concentration and enhance implantation profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If rotational and oscillating movements are used for ion beam scanning, then the ion beam can cover the entire wafer surface, but the mechanical complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer surface coverageVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical rotational and oscillating movements with electrostatic deflection fields to scan the ion beam across the wafer surface. The electrostatic deflectors use electric fields to steer the ion beam without any moving mechanical parts, thereby achieving full wafer surface coverage while eliminating the mechanical complexity of rotational and oscillating mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the energy filter is positioned in the vacuum chamber, then it can filter ions effectively, but mechanical stresses and particle contamination occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveion filtering effectivenessVSAvoidmechanical stress and particle contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the energy filter from the vacuum chamber environment and positions it outside the vacuum space. This allows the energy filter to be protected from mechanical stresses and particle contamination that occur within the vacuum chamber during wafer processing, while still maintaining its ion filtering effectiveness through precise positioning in the ion beam path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a vacuum window or membrane as an intermediary between the energy filter and the vacuum chamber. This intermediary allows the energy filter to remain outside the vacuum environment (protected from contamination) while still enabling effective ion filtering by transmitting selected ions through the window into the vacuum chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If ion implantation is performed at room temperature, then the process is simpler, but point defect concentration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoiddefect concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter during ion implantation by heating the wafer to elevated temperatures (typically 150-450°C). This temperature increase reduces point defect concentration in the implantation area by enhancing defect annealing and improving dopant activation, thereby achieving more precise doping profiles while maintaining process simplicity through integrated heating capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in reduced point defect concentrations, improved reproducibility, and more controlled doping profiles with reduced mechanical stress and particle contamination, enabling precise and efficient semiconductor wafer processing.

Implementation Method 1

ion implantation is used for doping and for producing defect profiles at predefined depths

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon implantation: Ion Implantation

Implementation Method 2

An energy filter 6 is well-adapted to ion implantation... the energy filter 6 is structured in such a way that it has areas of different thicknesses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy filtering: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 3

synchronized electrostatic deflection of the ion beam and mechanical movement of the filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic deflection: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 4

the use of a heatable wafer chuck to reduce point defect concentration and enhance implantation profiles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11929229B2Semiconductor wafer
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 MI2 FACTORY GMBH
  • US11929229B2 patent drawing
  • US11929229B2 patent drawing
  • US11929229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor wafer includes a first surface and an implantation area adjacent to the first surface and a certain distance away from the first surface, the implantation area including implanted particles and defects. A defect concentration in the implantation area deviates by less than 5% from a maximum defect concentration in the implantation area.