Semiconductor Wafer Inspection via Representative Optical Parameter Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As semiconductor devices become increasingly integrated, existing inspection methods struggle to reliably detect defects due to process variations, leading to inefficiencies in fabrication processes and potential defects in the final products.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor wafer inspection method and system that selects a representative optical parameter with a correlation greater than a threshold, using a sophisticated optical inspection system to scan patterns, detect defects by comparing reference and inspection values, and amplify defect signals to improve detection precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional inspection methods are used to scan all optical parameters, then comprehensive data is collected, but detection precision is insufficient due to process variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection precisionVSAvoidinspection method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the representative optical parameter that has high correlation with pattern characteristics from the full set of optical parameters. This selective extraction reduces data complexity while maintaining detection precision by focusing on the most relevant parameter for defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the inspection approach by selecting and monitoring a specific representative optical parameter instead of all optical parameters. This parameter selection based on correlation analysis with pattern characteristics optimizes detection precision while reducing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple optical parameters are monitored, then more information is obtained, but inspection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection reliabilityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential representative optical parameter that provides sufficient information for reliable defect detection. This extraction eliminates redundant parameter monitoring while maintaining inspection reliability through focused measurement of the most informative parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by monitoring only the necessary representative optical parameter rather than all available parameters. This partial monitoring approach achieves adequate inspection reliability with reduced time investment by focusing on the critical parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If inspection sensitivity is increased to detect subtle defects, then defect detection capability improves, but false detection rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidfalse detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selecting a representative optical parameter that specifically correlates with pattern characteristics and defect signatures. This localized focus on the most relevant parameter enables sensitive defect detection while reducing false detections caused by variations in other unrelated parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes from monitoring all optical parameters to monitoring a selected representative parameter with high correlation to pattern characteristics. This parameter change enables the system to detect subtle defects with high sensitivity while maintaining low false detection rates by focusing on the most discriminative parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more precise detection of defects, reducing the occurrence of defects during semiconductor device fabrication by selectively amplifying defect signals and improving the reliability of inspection methods.

Implementation Method 1

a light source configured to emit an incident light on the wafer, a detector configured to detect a reflected light from the wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11004712B2Method of inspecting semiconductor wafer, inspection system for performing the same, and method of fabricating semiconductor device using the same
Publication Date: 2021.05.11 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11004712B2 patent drawing
  • US11004712B2 patent drawing
  • US11004712B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods of inspecting semiconductor wafers, inspection systems for performing the same, and methods of fabricating semiconductor devices using the same. A method of inspecting a semiconductor wafer including preparing a wafer including zones each having patterns, obtaining representative values for the patterns, scanning the patterns under an optical condition to obtain optical signals for the patterns, each of the optical signals including optical parameters, selecting a representative optical parameter that is one of the optical parameters that has a correlation with the representative values, obtaining a reference value of the representative optical parameter for a reference pattern, and obtaining a defect of an inspection pattern by comparing the reference value with an inspection value of the representative optical parameter for the inspection pattern.