Wafer Centering and EBR Measurement via Laser Reflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor manufacturing processes face challenges in accurately detecting and correcting edge bead removal (EBR) size and wafer centering errors, which can lead to time loss, equipment damage, and quality deterioration due to reliance on operator skill and late detection.

Innovation Solution

A semiconductor manufacturing apparatus equipped with a rotatable device and a sensor system that uses a laser beam to detect changes in the wafer surface, allowing for precise measurement of EBR size and wafer centering, and includes a feedback system for automatic correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If operator skill-based monitoring is used to check EBR size, then flexibility in operation is maintained, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to dependency on operator skill level

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidEBR size measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual operator-based visual inspection with an automated optical measurement system using laser beams and position-sensitive detectors. This substitution eliminates dependency on operator skill while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable measurement parameters and automated feedback control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary measurement system consisting of laser beams, position-sensitive detectors, and signal processing units that act as a mediator between the EBR process and quality control. This intermediary automatically captures and analyzes EBR size data, providing objective measurements independent of operator capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If EBR size checking is performed after all processes, then complete process flow is maintained, but loss of time increases and quality deterioration occurs due to late detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess flow continuityVSAvoidtime loss from late detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by performing EBR size measurement immediately after the EBR process completes, rather than waiting until the end of all processes. This early detection enables timely feedback and correction, preventing time loss and quality deterioration while maintaining continuous process flow through automated in-line measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback mechanism where EBR size measurements are immediately fed back to the control system, enabling real-time monitoring and adjustment. This feedback loop allows the system to detect and correct EBR size deviations promptly, preventing downstream quality issues without interrupting the overall process flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If manual monitoring of EBR size is used, then device complexity is minimized, but reliability deteriorates because proper processing is not performed until centering error is detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidprocess reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple manual monitoring with an automated optical measurement and control system. Although this increases device complexity, it dramatically improves reliability by continuously monitoring EBR size and wafer centering, enabling proactive correction of deviations before they cause quality failures or equipment damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service through automated measurement and feedback control systems that continuously monitor and adjust EBR size and wafer centering without human intervention. This self-monitoring capability ensures consistent quality control and reliable detection of process deviations, eliminating the need for manual inspection while enhancing overall process reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables reliable and accurate monitoring of EBR size and wafer centering, reducing errors and improving the quality of semiconductor wafers by automating the correction process.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor for irradiating a laser beam onto a surface of the wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

a detector including a plurality of modules for detecting the laser beam reflected from the wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS7495757B2Semiconductor manufacturing apparatus and wafer processing method
Publication Date: 2009.02.24 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US7495757B2 patent drawing
  • US7495757B2 patent drawing
  • US7495757B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor manufacturing apparatus and a wafer processing method are disclosed. The semiconductor manufacturing apparatus, comprises a rotatable device for supporting a wafer. A sensor for irradiating a laser beam onto a surface of the wafer and a detector including a plurality of modules for detecting the laser beam reflected from the wafer are also included. The sensor obtains information regarding the wafer, based on a change in the surface status of the wafer, which the modules sense when the laser beam is reflected from the wafer.