Wafer-Level Microelectronic Die Stacking Packaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional microelectronic device stacking processes are costly, complex, and result in high footprints and vertical space occupation due to multiple steps and rigorous packaging processes, leading to potential damage and discarding of entire devices if individual dies become inoperable.

Innovation Solution

Wafer-level packaging method involving releasably attaching known good microelectronic dies to a carrier substrate, stacking, encapsulating, and then separating them, with electrical couplers attached after carrier removal, ensuring only functional dies are used and reducing the number of packaging steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional stacking processes are used with multiple packaging steps, then devices can be assembled, but the process becomes costly and complex with reduced throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidpackaging process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate packaging steps (die attachment, wire bonding, encapsulation, singulation) into a single integrated wafer-level process where all operations are performed on the wafer before singulation, eliminating the need for separate handling and processing of individual dies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs all packaging operations (attachment, bonding, encapsulation) in advance while the dies are still on the wafer, before the final singulation step. This preliminary action eliminates the need for subsequent handling and processing of individual dies, reducing complexity and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional stacking processes with interposer substrate are used, then devices can be mounted, but the footprint and vertical space occupation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice assemblyVSAvoiddevice footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the interposer substrate from the packaging structure, directly mounting the stacked dies to the target substrate. This removal of the intermediate layer reduces both the footprint and vertical profile of the final device assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a planar packaging approach requiring large footprint for interposer and ball-grid arrays to a vertical stacking approach where multiple dies are stacked in the Z-dimension, achieving higher component density within a smaller footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If dies are tested before singulation, then functional dies can be identified, but rigorous packaging processes after testing can still cause damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedie functionality testingVSAvoiddie integrity after processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs die testing before singulation and then immediately proceeds with all subsequent packaging operations (attachment, bonding, encapsulation) while the dies are still protected on the wafer. The encapsulation is performed before singulation, providing continuous protection throughout the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies encapsulant material before singulation to create a protective cushion around the dies during subsequent handling and processing steps, preventing damage to the dies while maintaining their functional status

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Reliability

If multiple separate packaging steps are used, then devices can be assembled, but throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice assemblyVSAvoidmanufacturing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple sequential packaging operations into a single parallel wafer-level process, where all dies on the wafer undergo attachment, bonding, and encapsulation simultaneously in one processing cycle, dramatically increasing throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous processing by performing all packaging operations on the wafer without breaking the process flow or requiring intermediate handling of individual dies, eliminating idle time and maximizing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS8704380B2Methods for wafer-level packaging of microfeature devices and microfeature devices formed using such methods
Publication Date: 2014.04.22 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US8704380B2 patent drawing
  • US8704380B2 patent drawing
  • US8704380B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for wafer-level packaging of microfeature devices and microfeature devices formed using such methods are disclosed herein. A method for packaging microfeature devices in accordance with an embodiment of the invention can include releasably attaching a plurality of first known good microelectronic dies to a carrier substrate in a desired arrangement. In several embodiments, for example, the first dies can be releasably attached to an attachment feature on the carrier substrate. The method can also include attaching one or more second known good microelectronic dies to the individual first dies in a stacked configuration to form a plurality of stacked devices. The method further includes at least partially encapsulating the stacked devices and separating the stacked devices from each other.