Multi-Chamber Wafer Scheduling Using Predictive Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing processes face inefficiencies due to resource conflicts and variations in product idle times, leading to reduced throughput and quality of finished products, as existing scheduling methods rely on industry experience and past experiments rather than data-driven optimization.

Innovation Solution

A simulation-based optimization technique using machine learning models and computer simulations to determine resource scheduling for manufacturing tools with multiple chambers, optimizing task durations and resource utilization to minimize idle times and enhance throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If scheduling is based on industry experience and past experiments, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing throughput and resource utilization are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing throughputVSAvoidscheduling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary computer simulations to generate multiple candidate schedules before actual manufacturing execution. These simulations predict outcomes and identify optimal scheduling strategies in advance, allowing the system to select the best schedule without real-time complexity during actual production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual copies of the manufacturing process through computer simulations. These simulation models replicate chamber behaviors, task durations, and resource constraints, allowing optimization to be performed in the virtual domain without affecting physical production complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If resource allocation does not account for task duration variations, then scheduling simplicity is maintained, but product idle time increases and quality consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct quality consistencyVSAvoidproduct idle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts scheduling parameters based on predicted task duration variations. By incorporating duration predictions from machine learning models and simulation results, the scheduler modifies start times, resource assignments, and task sequences to minimize idle periods while maintaining quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses historical task duration data and simulation results to continuously refine scheduling decisions. Performance metrics from actual executions feed back into the simulation models, improving predictions of task durations and enabling progressively better scheduling that reduces idle time and enhances quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If multi-chamber resources are not optimized, then resource utilization is reduced, but scheduling complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool throughputVSAvoidresource coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation system serves multiple functions: it predicts task durations, generates candidate schedules, evaluates resource utilization, and optimizes chamber coordination. This multi-functional approach consolidates complexity into a single simulation-based platform rather than requiring separate systems for each optimization aspect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The computer simulation acts as an intermediary between resource availability and task scheduling. It mediates the complex interactions between multiple chambers, task dependencies, and resource constraints by translating these factors into optimized schedules that maximize throughput without direct complex coordination during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11901204B2Predictive wafer scheduling for multi-chamber semiconductor equipment
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US11901204B2 patent drawing
  • US11901204B2 patent drawing
  • US11901204B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is technology for performing a simulation based optimization to identify a schedule for a manufacturing tool. An example method may include determining, by a processing device, resources of a manufacturing tool, wherein the resources comprise a first chamber and a second chamber; accessing task data indicating a first manufacturing task and a second manufacturing task; determining a duration to perform the first manufacturing task using the first chamber and a duration to perform the second manufacturing task using the second chamber; updating a machine learning model based on the duration to perform the first manufacturing task and the duration to perform the second manufacturing task; performing a set of computer simulations that uses the machine learning model and the task data to produce a set of simulation results; storing, by the processing device, a simulation result of the set of simulation results in a data store.