Wafer Spatial Failure Detection Using Transform and Cluster Analysis

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting spatial failures in integrated circuit wafers are inefficient, requiring significant resources and time while increasing the risk of missing defects, which can lead to unusable ICs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing transforms and cluster signature analysis to quickly and accurately detect spatial failures by analyzing only the coordinates of defects, optimizing memory usage and processing speed without increasing error rates, and varying resolution to optimize detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional methods are used to detect spatial failures in wafers, then detection coverage is maintained, but processing time increases and memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the failure detection process into two distinct stages: a first stage that performs comprehensive spatial failure detection using coordinate analysis, and a second stage that performs additional detection on remaining failures. This segmentation allows the system to quickly identify and remove obvious failure patterns in the first stage, reducing the workload for subsequent analysis while maintaining comprehensive detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential coordinate information of spatial failures for analysis, rather than processing complete failure data sets. By taking out only the necessary coordinate parameters and using them to generate histograms and perform pattern matching, the system significantly reduces memory requirements and processing time while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive failure analysis is performed on all spatial failures, then detection accuracy is maintained, but memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential coordinate information of spatial failures for analysis, rather than processing complete failure data sets. By taking out only the necessary coordinate parameters and using them to generate histograms and perform pattern matching, the system significantly reduces memory requirements while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of analyzing all spatial failures comprehensively from the start, the patent inverts the approach by first analyzing failures in a simplified manner to identify and remove obvious patterns, then performing more detailed analysis only on the remaining failures. This inversion reduces the quantity of data requiring comprehensive analysis while maintaining overall detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Measurement precision

If high resolution analysis is used to optimize detection, then detection accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic two-stage detection process where the analysis resolution and depth are adjusted based on the detection stage and the characteristics of remaining failures. The first stage uses coordinate-based histogram analysis for quick pattern identification, while the second stage applies more detailed analysis only where necessary, optimizing the balance between detection precision and processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial analysis actions in the first stage by focusing on identifying and removing common failure patterns through histogram analysis, rather than performing exhaustive analysis on all failures. This partial action approach maintains high detection accuracy for common patterns while significantly reducing processing time, with more detailed analysis applied only to remaining cases in the second stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7602964B2Method and apparatus for detection of failures in a wafer using transforms and cluster signature analysis
Publication Date: 2009.10.13
  • US7602964B2 patent drawing
  • US7602964B2 patent drawing
  • US7602964B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Detecting spatial failures in a wafer can be performed quickly and accurately by using transformations and cluster signature analysis. For this technique, a system can receive failure coordinates for the wafer, wherein each failure coordinate indicates a spatial failure. A failure array can be generated based on a resolution of those failure coordinates. A first set of objects, e.g. linear and arc objects, can be detected in the failure array using transformations. A second set of objects, e.g. blob and scratch objects, can be detected in the failure array using cluster signature analysis. This technique advantageously reduces the amount of memory required to perform the analysis and increases the processing speed without increasing the error rate of detection.