Wafer Start-Time Scheduling for Multi-Chamber Throughput Bottlenecks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manufacturing processes face inefficiencies due to resource conflicts and variations in processing times, leading to reduced throughput and product quality, as existing scheduling methods rely on industry experience and past experiments rather than predictive optimization.

Innovation Solution

A simulation-based optimization technique using machine learning models to determine resource utilization and task durations, performing computer simulations to generate optimized schedules that minimize idle times and resource conflicts, thereby enhancing throughput and product consistency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional scheduling methods based on industry experience and past experiments are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing throughput and resource utilization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing throughputVSAvoidscheduling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by training machine learning models on historical manufacturing data before actual scheduling occurs. The models predict task durations and resource requirements in advance, enabling optimized schedules to be generated before production begins, thus improving throughput without adding operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical scheduling approaches (based on human experience and manual planning) with an intelligent system using machine learning models and computer simulations. This substitution enables data-driven optimization of throughput and resource utilization while maintaining system manageability through automated decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of time

If fixed scheduling approaches are used, then schedule stability is maintained, but idle time variations and resource conflicts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer idle timeVSAvoidschedule adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling system transitions from static, fixed schedules to dynamic scheduling by using machine learning models that adapt to varying task durations and resource availability. The system continuously learns from actual performance data and adjusts schedules in real-time, minimizing wafer idle time while maintaining adaptability to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by monitoring actual task completion times and resource utilization, then using this information to update and retrain machine learning models. This closed-loop approach enables the schedule to adapt to actual performance variations, reducing idle time while maintaining flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If predictive modeling with machine learning is implemented, then scheduling optimization improves, but computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask duration prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel training and simulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing machine learning model training on specific, critical parameters such as task duration predictions for particular chambers and processes. Rather than attempting to model all manufacturing variables, the system concentrates computational resources on the most impactful predictions, improving accuracy while managing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses computer simulations as virtual copies of the actual manufacturing process to test and optimize schedules without affecting real production. These digital twins allow the system to evaluate multiple scheduling scenarios and select optimal solutions, improving prediction accuracy while isolating computational complexity from the physical manufacturing system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12154804B2Predictive wafer scheduling for multi-chamber semiconductor equipment
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US12154804B2 patent drawing
  • US12154804B2 patent drawing
  • US12154804B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes identifying a set of wafers, wherein each wafer is associated with a respective start time of a set of start times, determining whether the set of wafers includes an idle wafer, in response to determining that the set of wafers includes an idle wafer that is idle for a duration that exceeds a predefined threshold value, generating a modified set of start times by modifying at least the start time for the idle wafer, and initiating a computer simulation forecasting processing of the set of wafers using a wafer modification chamber and a wafer movement chamber based on the modified set of start times. The computer simulation uses a machine learning model trained based on a first duration to perform a first manufacturing task using the wafer modification chamber and a second duration to perform a second manufacturing task using the wafer movement chamber.