Wafer-Test Prediction of Future Electronic Component Faults

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for predicting semiconductor component failures during final test are hindered by unknown process constraints, such as packaging, leading to unreliable classification labels and increased costs due to unforeseen component failures.

Innovation Solution

A method using a trained machine learning model, specifically employing an Expectation-Maximization algorithm and boosted trees, to predict potential failures based on wafer test data, accounting for subsequent processes like packaging, and correcting noisy labels to improve prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If final test classification labels are used to predict component failures, then prediction can be performed, but the labels are unreliable due to unknown process constraints such as packaging causing additional failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidclassification label reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing wafer test predictions before the actual final test and packaging processes occur. The machine learning model predicts future errors at the wafer test stage, allowing early identification of components that will fail during subsequent packaging or final test, thereby preventing unreliable final test labels from being generated in the first place

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary machine learning model that acts as a mediator between wafer test data and final test outcomes. This model accounts for unknown process constraints by learning the relationship between initial component characteristics and future failures, effectively bridging the gap caused by unobservable packaging and process variables

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If unknown process constraints like packaging are accounted for in prediction, then prediction accuracy improves, but the complexity of the prediction model increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprediction model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs self-service by automatically learning and adapting to unknown process constraints from historical data without requiring explicit programming or manual configuration. The model autonomously identifies patterns related to packaging and process-induced failures, reducing the need for complex manual modeling of each process step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the prediction approach from directly modeling complex process constraints to predicting error probabilities based on observable wafer test parameters. The machine learning model changes the parameter space from process-specific variables to component-level electrical and functional test characteristics, simplifying the model while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If components are tested at final test stage, then actual failures are detected, but costs increase due to unnecessary testing of components that would fail during packaging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing error prediction at the wafer test stage, before components undergo expensive packaging and final test processes. Components predicted to fail during packaging are identified early, allowing manufacturers to avoid the cost of packaging and final testing components that would ultimately fail, thereby reducing energy loss and manufacturing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by taking preventive measures at wafer test to counteract future failures that would occur during packaging. By predicting and flagging components destined for failure before they undergo subsequent processes, the system prevents waste of resources on components that cannot be salvaged, effectively acting in advance to neutralize the harmful effect of unknown process constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentEP4632394A1Method for predicting a future error of an electronic component
Publication Date: 2025.10.15 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP4632394A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4632394A1 patent drawing
  • EP4632394A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method (100) for predicting a future fault of an electronic component (1), comprising the following steps: - providing (101) test data of the electronic component (1), wherein the test data result from an electrical and/or mechanical functional test of the electronic component (1) as part of a wafer test, - determining (102) a predicted presence of a fault at the time of the functional test on the basis of the provided test data using a trained machine learning model, wherein the trained machine learning model models at least one subsequent process after the wafer test, wherein the predicted presence of the fault takes into account a probability that a fault of the electronic component (1) will be caused by the at least one subsequent process, - predicting (103) the future fault on the basis of the determined predicted presence of the fault.Furthermore, the invention relates to a computer program, a device and a storage medium for this purpose.