3D Wafer Volume Inspection with Averaged Cross-Section Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for inspecting three-dimensional semiconductor structures in wafers face challenges in achieving high accuracy and speed due to limitations in image acquisition time, noise ratio, and drift issues, particularly as feature sizes approach sub-nanometer scales, leading to inefficient data collection and potential damage to the wafer during the slice-and-image approach.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming a stack of averaged image slices by fast milling and scanning of cross-section surfaces, using a moving mean value to reduce noise and compensate for drift, and optimizing image acquisition with convolution kernels or machine learning algorithms to enhance throughput and accuracy, allowing for more efficient inspection of semiconductor wafers without the need for extensive image scanning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional slice-and-image approach is used for 3D inspection, then measurement precision can be achieved, but inspection time becomes excessively long and wafer damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge shape measurement precisionVSAvoidimage acquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing fast milling to create cross-section surfaces before detailed imaging. Multiple cross-sections are rapidly prepared in advance, allowing subsequent imaging to be faster and more efficient. This pre-preparation of sample surfaces enables the inspection process to proceed more quickly while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the inspection process into multiple independent cross-section imaging steps. Instead of imaging the entire 3D volume in one slow process, the wafer is divided into multiple thin cross-sections that are imaged separately and then reconstructed computationally. This segmentation allows each section to be imaged faster and enables parallel processing of different sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If traditional slice-and-image approach is used for 3D inspection, then measurement precision can be achieved, but wafer damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge shape measurement precisionVSAvoidwafer damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary fast milling to create the necessary cross-section surfaces before imaging, rather than slowly removing material during the inspection process. This pre-preparation minimizes the total time the wafer is exposed to damaging milling operations while still achieving the required measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple copies of cross-sectional views at different depths and reconstructs the 3D structure computationally from these 2D copies. This approach allows accurate 3D measurement without requiring physical slicing or extensive material removal, thereby reducing wafer damage while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If fast milling and scanning are used to reduce acquisition time, then productivity increases, but noise ratio worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple fast-acquired cross-section images into a single reconstructed 3D model. By combining information from multiple noisy 2D slices, the computational reconstruction produces a higher quality 3D representation with improved signal-to-noise ratio. The merging process allows fast acquisition while recovering information quality through data integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple copies of cross-sectional data at different depths and uses computational algorithms to reconstruct the 3D structure. This copying and reconstruction approach allows fast scanning with reduced noise in individual images, while the combined 3D reconstruction recovers the lost signal quality through mathematical processing of multiple copies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Productivity

If fast milling and scanning are used to reduce acquisition time, then productivity increases, but drift issues worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoiddrift compensation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the inspection into multiple discrete cross-section measurements taken at different depths. Each cross-section is measured independently and quickly, minimizing the time for each individual measurement and reducing drift accumulation. The segmented approach allows drift to be corrected between sections rather than compounding over a long continuous measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary fast milling to create all necessary cross-section surfaces before imaging begins. This pre-preparation establishes stable reference surfaces for all subsequent measurements, reducing drift issues during the imaging phase. By completing the milling beforehand, the imaging process can proceed quickly without interruption, minimizing opportunities for drift to affect measurement consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces image acquisition time, improves signal-to-noise ratio, and increases the robustness of inspections, enabling more precise and efficient analysis of semiconductor structures with reduced wafer damage, thus addressing the limitations of existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

A charged particle beam is used for imaging the cross-section surfaces, and at least one detector is sensitive to secondary particles and backscattered particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary particle detection: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

A charged particle beam is used for imaging the cross-section surfaces, and at least one detector is sensitive to secondary particles and backscattered particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBackscattered particle detection: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

A focused ion beam is used for milling cross-section surfaces into the wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam milling: Ion Beam

Implementation Method 4

A focused ion beam is used for milling cross-section surfaces into the wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical vapor deposition: Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS20250022680A13D volume inspection of semiconductor wafers with increased throughput and accuracy
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • US20250022680A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022680A1 patent drawing
  • US20250022680A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method for volume inspection of semiconductor wafers are configured for milling and fast image acquisition of cross-sections surfaces in an inspection volume. High quality images can be obtained by restriction of the imaging to regions of interest or by averaging over several fast image scans. The method and device can be utilized for quantitative metrology, defect detection, process monitoring, defect review, and inspection of integrated circuits within semiconductor wafers.