3D Wafer Volume Inspection With Adaptive Image Conformity Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D volume inspection methods for semiconductor wafers are complex and limited to expert environments due to the need for comprehensive experimentation and deep knowledge, making them inaccessible for routine use, especially with the challenge of achieving high precision in measuring edge shapes and dimensions at nanoscale features.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for 3D volume inspection using a dual beam device that includes acquiring and processing two-dimensional images to generate standardized datasets, with a workflow architecture that allows for modular and self-consistent performance, enabling robust and automated execution in routine environments by evaluating image conformity and adjusting parameters accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a dual beam system is used to acquire 3D volume image data by slicing and imaging cross-section surfaces, then measurement precision of edge shapes and dimensions is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need for comprehensive experimentation and deep expert knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precision of edge shapes and dimensionsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex 3D inspection workflow into distinct modular components: image acquisition module, image processing module, and 3D reconstruction module. Each module handles specific tasks independently, allowing the system to maintain high measurement precision while reducing operational complexity through standardized, reusable processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated parameter optimization that adjusts imaging parameters (such as beam focus, acceleration voltage, and scanning parameters) based on the specific sample characteristics and inspection requirements. This eliminates the need for expert experimentation by automatically finding optimal parameters, thereby maintaining measurement precision while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive experimentation and deep expert knowledge are required to configure the inspection method, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates making it inaccessible for routine use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-calibration and self-optimization capabilities where the system automatically adjusts its parameters and processing algorithms based on the sample being inspected. The workflow configuration automatically adapts to different semiconductor structures without requiring expert intervention, enabling routine users to achieve high measurement precision through automated parameter selection and processing optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent pre-configures standardized inspection workflows and processing pipelines that are ready to be applied to different sample types. Common inspection scenarios have pre-optimized parameters and processing steps stored in a library, allowing users to select appropriate workflows without performing comprehensive experimentation, thus maintaining precision while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If a large number of cross-section surfaces are milled and imaged to achieve high accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity decreases due to the time-consuming nature of the process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh accuracyVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements adaptive sampling strategies that determine the optimal number of cross-section surfaces to mill and image based on the specific inspection requirements and sample characteristics. Instead of always milling a large fixed number of sections, the system uses preliminary analysis to identify regions of interest and adjusts the number of sections accordingly, maintaining high measurement precision while reducing unnecessary milling operations to improve productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic quality checks and validation steps during the milling and imaging process. Instead of milling all cross-section surfaces continuously, the system periodically verifies measurement accuracy and adjusts the inspection plan accordingly, allowing early termination when sufficient precision is achieved, thus balancing measurement precision with productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Measurement precision

If the sampling raster resolution is reduced to improve measurement precision, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to the longer acquisition time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic raster resolution adjustment that adapts the sampling resolution based on the local features being inspected. In regions with fine critical dimensions, the system automatically reduces the raster size to improve measurement precision, while in regions with larger features, it uses coarser sampling to reduce acquisition time. This dynamic adaptation maintains high precision where needed while minimizing overall inspection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different sampling resolutions to different regions of the sample based on their importance and feature size. Critical regions with small features receive finer sampling for high precision measurement, while less critical regions use coarser sampling. This localized quality approach optimizes the balance between measurement precision and acquisition time by concentrating computational resources where they are most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240281952A13D volume inspection method and method of configuring of a 3D volume inspection method
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • US20240281952A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281952A1 patent drawing
  • US20240281952A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of 3D-inspection of a semiconductor object inside of an inspection volume of a wafer or wafer sample comprises a 3D data processing and a step for acquiring a plurality of two-dimensional images. The acquiring step comprises a monitoring step for determining whether a two-dimensional image is in conformity with a desired property of the 3D data processing. The disclosure further comprises a method of configuring the method of 3D-inspection and a system configured to execute the method of 3D-inspection as well as the method of configuring the method of 3D-inspection.