Wafer Weak-Point Inspection Using Real-Time Review Recipes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing semiconductor inspection tools face challenges in achieving high throughput while maintaining sensitivity, particularly in detecting defects on wafers, as current methods require full wafer inspections that are time-consuming and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a high-resolution SEM with a SORIL objective lens, smart review sampling filter, and universal defect identification unit to perform focused inspections on critical 'weak points' defined by a wafer map, enabling self-learning and adaptive inspection plans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full wafer inspection is performed, then defect detection coverage is improved, but inspection throughput deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection coverageVSAvoidinspection throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The wafer inspection process is segmented into two phases: an initial full wafer inspection to build a defect map, followed by focused inspections on identified weak points. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high defect detection coverage while improving throughput by avoiding redundant full wafer re-inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary full wafer inspection to create a defect map before subsequent inspections. This preliminary action identifies weak points that guide future inspections, enabling the system to focus resources on critical areas and significantly improve throughput without sacrificing detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If focused inspection on weak points is implemented, then inspection throughput is improved, but defect detection coverage may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoiddefect detection coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from initial full wafer inspections to dynamically adjust subsequent inspection strategies. The defect map generated from preliminary inspections provides feedback that guides focused inspections, ensuring that weak points are accurately identified and re-inspected, thereby maintaining high defect detection coverage while improving throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection strategy is made dynamic by adapting the inspection scope based on identified weak points. The system transitions from static full wafer inspection to dynamic focused inspection, adjusting the inspection area and parameters based on real-time defect map analysis, thus optimizing both throughput and detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If high-resolution SEM is used, then measurement precision is improved, but inspection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection resolutionVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

High-resolution SEM inspection is applied locally only to identified weak points rather than uniformly across the entire wafer. This local quality approach maintains high measurement precision for critical areas while significantly reducing total inspection time by avoiding high-resolution scanning of defect-free regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial high-resolution inspection only where necessary (at weak points) rather than excessive full-wafer high-resolution scanning. This partial action principle applies high-resolution SEM selectively to critical areas, achieving the needed measurement precision while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances inspection throughput by concentrating efforts on defect-prone areas, while accumulating knowledge for improved future inspections, thus optimizing resource utilization and yield management.

Implementation Method 1

a charged particle beam inspection/review tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharged particle beam interaction: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS12394674B2Method and machine for examining wafers
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US12394674B2 patent drawing
  • US12394674B2 patent drawing
  • US12394674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and machine utilizes the real-time recipe to perform weak point inspection on a series of wafers during the fabrication of integrated circuits. Each real-time recipe essentially corresponds to a practical fabrication history of a wafer to be examined and/or the examination results of at least one examined wafer of same “lot”. Therefore, different wafers can be examined by using different recipes where each recipe corresponds to a specific condition of a wafer to be examined, even these wafers are received by a machine for examining at the same time.