Wafer Yield Trend Monitoring via Regional Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current yield management systems in semiconductor manufacturing struggle with timely calculations and storage of derived parameters and aggregate data due to limited computational bandwidth and storage capacity, leading to delays in identifying and rectifying defective trends in the manufacturing process, especially when dealing with vast amounts of data from thousands of integrated circuits on each wafer.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced to calculate and store regional aggregated data, designating equal-area spatial regions on wafers to simplify statistical calculations, allowing quicker access to critical manufacturing statistics and trends, thereby reducing the time required for computations and providing timely feedback for process control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If calculations of derived parameters and aggregate data are performed on the complete set of raw test data, then the accuracy and completeness of manufacturing trend analysis is improved, but the computational time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of manufacturing trend analysisVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the wafer into multiple spatial regions and performs aggregate data calculations separately for each region rather than processing the entire wafer as one unit. This segmentation reduces the computational complexity and time required while maintaining the ability to identify localized manufacturing trends and defects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent calculates aggregate data for a selected number of spatial regions rather than all possible regions, and computes derived parameters for a subset of the complete test data set. This partial action approach provides sufficient information for manufacturing trend analysis without the excessive computational burden of processing every data point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If regional aggregate data is calculated for every spatial region on each wafer, then the ability to identify localized manufacturing defects is improved, but the storage capacity and computational bandwidth required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to identify localized defectsVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The wafer is divided into a predetermined number of spatial regions, and aggregate data is calculated for each region. This segmentation enables localized defect identification while managing data volume by focusing on regional statistics rather than individual device data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different spatial regions on the wafer are analyzed with region-specific aggregate data, allowing the system to identify and characterize localized manufacturing defects in specific areas while using less storage capacity than analyzing every individual device across the entire wafer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If a large number of spatial regions are designated on each wafer for detailed analysis, then the resolution of manufacturing trend detection is improved, but the arithmetic computation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution of manufacturing trend detectionVSAvoidarithmetic computation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wafer is divided into a predetermined number of spatial regions that balances detection resolution with computational feasibility. The patent selects a number of regions that provides sufficient detail for manufacturing trend detection without creating excessive arithmetic computation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts the number of spatial regions and the type of aggregate data calculated based on the specific manufacturing process and defect characteristics being monitored. This parameter optimization allows the system to achieve adequate detection resolution while controlling computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7496478B2Method of monitoring a semiconductor manufacturing trend
Publication Date: 2009.02.24 RATHEI DIETER
  • US7496478B2 patent drawing
  • US7496478B2 patent drawing
  • US7496478B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A parametric parameter is selected, which has an upper specification limit and a lower specification limit. A storage percentile is determined. The storage percentile is equal to a product yield percentage if the number of the set of measurements greater than the upper specification limit exceeds the number of the set of measurements lower than the lower specification limit, and is equal to the product yield percentage subtracted from one hundred percent if the number of the set of measurements less than the lower specification limit exceeds the number of the set of measurements greater than the upper specification limit. A number of spatial regions on the wafer is designated. A first group of measurements from the set of measurements is obtained for a first spatial region of the spatial regions. A measurement closest to the storage percentile is stored.