Wagering Game Re-spin Mechanism for Bonus Triggering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gaming machines often fail to provide players with additional opportunities to achieve bonus combinations, leading to boredom and reduced player engagement, as they typically offer only a single chance to enter the bonus game and do not allow for increased rewards based on additional wagers during the basic game.

Innovation Solution

A gaming terminal with a special mode that allows players to re-spin reels not displaying a full bonus-triggering combination after an initial spin, enabled by an additional wager, providing enhanced opportunities to achieve bonus symbols and increased bonus awards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If players are given only a single opportunity to achieve bonus combinations in the basic game, then the game structure remains simple and easy to operate, but player engagement decreases and boredom increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegame structure simplicityVSAvoidplayer engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically identifying and isolating reels that did not display bonus symbols after the initial spin, preparing them for re-spin before the player even requests it. This preliminary preparation enables the enhancement feature to seamlessly provide additional bonus opportunities without complicating the player's interaction with the game.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The game dynamically adapts by transitioning from a static single-spin structure to a dynamic multi-stage process. When players activate the enhancement feature, the system dynamically re-spins only the non-bonus reels while maintaining the original bonus reels in place, creating a flexible game structure that responds to player choices and increases engagement without sacrificing operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If players are allowed to re-spin reels with additional wagers to achieve bonus combinations, then player engagement and entertainment value increase, but the game complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplayer engagementVSAvoidgame feature complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reels are segmented into two distinct groups: bonus reels that displayed bonus symbols and non-bonus reels that did not. This segmentation allows the enhancement feature to selectively re-spin only the non-bonus reels while preserving the bonus reels, thereby reducing the complexity of the re-spin mechanism compared to re-spinning all reels, and providing a clearer, more manageable game structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The enhancement feature applies local quality by treating different reels differently based on their bonus symbol display status. Bonus reels receive no further action and remain fixed, while non-bonus reels are selected for re-spinning. This localized differentiation simplifies the overall game logic compared to uniform re-spinning of all reels, as it focuses computational and mechanical resources only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If the system re-spins all reels after an initial spin, then players get additional bonus opportunities, but the cost to the operator increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonus opportunity frequencyVSAvoidoperator cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The enhancement feature extracts and isolates the bonus reels from the re-spin process. By identifying reels that already displayed bonus symbols and excluding them from re-spinning, the system reduces the number of reels requiring additional spins. This extraction principle directly reduces the operator's cost by minimizing the scope of re-spin operations while still providing players with additional bonus opportunities through the re-spun non-bonus reels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by re-spinning only a subset of reels (those that did not display bonus symbols) rather than all reels. This partial re-spin approach provides sufficient additional bonus opportunities for players to maintain engagement while significantly reducing the computational, mechanical, and operational costs compared to re-spinning the entire set of reels, achieving an optimal balance between player satisfaction and operator expense.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8002626B2Wagering game with enhancement feature for bonus-triggering event
Publication Date: 2011.08.23 LNW GAMING INC
  • US8002626B2 patent drawing
  • US8002626B2 patent drawing
  • US8002626B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gaming terminal (10) is utilized for playing a wagering game having a basic game and a bonus game. The gaming (10) terminal has a wager-input device (16a, 16b). A display (26) displays a plurality of moveable reels having symbols located thereon during the basic game. The symbols indicate a randomly selected outcome selected from a plurality of outcomes. The basic game implements a special mode in response to an enablement by a player. In response to the special mode being enabled and the movable reels displaying less than a full bonus triggering combination, the movable reels not displaying a portion of the full bonus triggering combination are re-spun.