Walk-Behind Material Distributor with Segmented Drive

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current material moving machines are heavy, fuel-inefficient, and poorly maneuverable, making them costly and environmentally unfriendly, with limitations in working in confined spaces and requiring extensive maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A compact, lightweight, self-propelled material moving apparatus with independently driven traction systems and interchangeable attachments, allowing for efficient operation in confined areas with minimal fuel and oil consumption, and easy transportation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If traditional material moving machines are used, then material moving capability is achieved, but weight increases and fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial moving capabilityVSAvoidmachine weight
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is divided into separate functional modules: a walk-behind operator platform, independently driven traction systems, and interchangeable attachments. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall weight while maintaining material moving capability through modular attachment selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional heavy hydrostatic drive systems with independently driven traction systems that use simpler mechanical transmission. This substitution reduces the weight of the powertrain while maintaining adequate power output for material moving tasks through direct drive mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Power

If traditional material moving machines are used, then material moving capability is achieved, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial moving capabilityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The machine features dynamically adjustable components including variable speed independently driven wheels and interchangeable attachments that can be selected based on specific task requirements. This dynamic adaptability allows the machine to optimize fuel consumption by using only the necessary power and attachments for each specific material moving task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements variable parameters in the drive system, including adjustable wheel speeds and interchangeable attachments, allowing the machine to change its operational parameters to match the specific material moving task. This parameter optimization reduces fuel consumption by avoiding excess power usage during lighter tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If traditional material moving machines are used, then material moving capability is achieved, but maneuverability in confined spaces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial moving capabilityVSAvoidmaneuverability in confined spaces
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The independent segmentation of the drive systems allows each wheel to be controlled separately, enabling the machine to perform tight turns and navigate confined spaces by differentiating wheel speeds. This independent control provides superior maneuverability in restricted areas compared to traditional coupled drive systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamically controlled independently driven wheels allow real-time adjustment of wheel speeds to optimize turning radius and maneuverability. The operator can dynamically vary wheel speeds to navigate tight corners and confined spaces while maintaining stable material moving capability during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Power

If traditional material moving machines are used, then material moving capability is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial moving capabilityVSAvoidmachine complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is segmented into modular components with standardized attachment interfaces, allowing easy interchangeability. This modular segmentation reduces overall system complexity by enabling operators to select only the necessary components for each task rather than managing a complex integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universal attachment interfaces that allow the same base machine to perform multiple material moving functions through interchangeable attachments. This universality reduces device complexity by eliminating the need for multiple specialized machines, as one platform can accommodate various attachments for different tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

5Power

If traditional material moving machines are used, then material moving capability is achieved, but environmental friendliness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial moving capabilityVSAvoidfuel and oil consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The machine uses variable parameter control in its drive system to optimize fuel and oil consumption based on actual task requirements. By dynamically adjusting wheel speeds and selecting appropriate attachments, the machine minimizes harmful emissions while maintaining adequate material moving capability, making it more environmentally friendly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8931189B2Apparatus and method for material distribution
Publication Date: 2015.01.13 JONES DAVID A
  • US8931189B2 patent drawing
  • US8931189B2 patent drawing
  • US8931189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and method for material distribution, including a drawbar to which is fixedly connected a bucket body. Wheels are attached to the drawbar on opposite sides of the bucket body between an open side and a gate thereof. A lower edge of the open side of the bucket body, which can receive material, is in the form of a cutting blade or teeth. The gate, which is disposed opposite from the open side, can be opened and closed. At least part of a top side of the bucket body forms a platform for an operator. At least one engine is provided and is drivingly connected to the wheels. A handlebar is connected to the bucket body, forward of the platform, for pivoting the bucket body about the wheels so that the cutting blade or teeth can be brought into or out of contact with a surface.