Adjustable Walker With Rear Extensions and Segmented Panels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional walkers are not suitable for use outside clinical settings due to their confinement, which limits their practicality and stability when entering or exiting, and they lack rear support for users.

Innovation Solution

A vertically and horizontally adjustable walker with open rear ends, non-pivotable rear wheels for stability, and extensions for rear support, combined with a horizontal upper support frame for underarm support and pivotable front caster wheels for easy steering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the walker is enclosed on all four sides to provide safety and support, then user safety is improved, but ease of entering and exiting the walker deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidease of entering and exiting
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The walker frame is segmented into four sides with the rear side divided into removable panels and fixed extensions. This segmentation allows the rear enclosure to be partially opened by removing panels while retaining fixed extensions for support, thereby enabling easy entry and exit while maintaining safety during use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rear panels are designed to be removable, transforming the static enclosed structure into a dynamic one that can be opened and closed. This allows the walker to transition between enclosed and open states, facilitating easy entry and exit while maintaining safety when enclosed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If rear panels are removed to facilitate entering and exiting, then ease of operation is improved, but stability of the walker deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of entering and exitingVSAvoidwalker stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The rear structure is segmented into removable panels and fixed extensions. The fixed extensions remain attached to the frame providing continuous structural support and stability, while the removable panels can be taken away to facilitate entry and exit without compromising the overall stability of the walker.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the rear structure have different properties: the fixed extensions provide rigid structural support for stability, while the removable panels provide flexible access. This local differentiation allows the walker to maintain stability while facilitating easy entry and exit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the walker is designed with fixed structure for stability, then reliability is improved, but adaptability to different user sizes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewalker stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to different user sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The walker incorporates adjustable components including height-adjustable armrests and removable rear panels. These dynamic features allow the structure to be customized for different user sizes and preferences while maintaining the overall stable framework through fixed extensions and rigid base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The walker is designed with universal features that accommodate different users: adjustable armrest heights, removable panels for various access needs, and extensions that can serve multiple functions including structural support and handholds. This multi-functionality enhances adaptability while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If extensions are added to the rear for support during exiting, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport during exitingVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The extensions are merged with the existing frame structure, serving dual purposes as both structural components and support handholds. This integration adds support functionality during exit without significantly increasing overall device complexity, as the extensions utilize the same materials and attachment methods as the main frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10583066B1Vertically and horizontally adjustable walker
Publication Date: 2020.03.10 ABROMS SUSAN
  • US10583066B1 patent drawing
  • US10583066B1 patent drawing
  • US10583066B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An adjustable walker having a horizontal base and a horizontal upper support frame, each being adjustable in width. A pair of vertical support frames are attached to the horizontal base frame and are adjustably attached to the horizontal upper support frame so that the horizontal upper support frame is adjustable in height. Extensions on the rear ends of the horizontal base frame and the horizontal upper support frame extend beyond the rear end of the walker. Pivotable caster wheels are attached to the front end of the horizontal base frame. Non-pivoting rear wheels are attached to the rear end of the horizontal base frame to stabilize the rear end. The horizontal upper support frame supports the upper body of a user. The extensions provide support to the user and stability to the walker as a user exits the rear of the walker to sit on a bed or chair.