Wall-Flow Filter Sintered Coating for Exhaust Gas Filtration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing particulate filters face challenges in maintaining filtration functionality after exposure to liquid water, which can impair their efficiency and robustness under varying operating conditions.

Innovation Solution

A wall-flow filter with a sintered coating composed of oxides, oxide-hydroxides, or other materials applied via a dry-coating process, ensuring the coating is stable and not affected by liquid water, thereby maintaining filtration efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a particulate filter is used to remove particles from exhaust gas, then filtration efficiency is improved, but exhaust-gas back pressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration efficiencyVSAvoidexhaust-gas back pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The filter substrate employs a porous ceramic structure with controlled pore size and distribution. The porous walls allow exhaust gas to pass through while trapping particles, achieving filtration efficiency without excessive pressure buildup. The porosity is optimized to balance particle capture with gas flow resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The filter features non-uniform pore distribution and varying wall thickness along its length. The inlet region has larger pores to handle high particle loads, while the outlet region has smaller pores for finer filtration. This local variation in structure allows efficient particle removal across different flow conditions while minimizing overall back pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If catalytically active coating is applied as a layer on the wall of a porous wall-flow filter, then catalytic effectiveness is improved, but exhaust-gas back pressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic effectivenessVSAvoidexhaust-gas back pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The catalytically active material is pre-dispersed within the porous wall structure during manufacturing, rather than applied as a surface coating. This preliminary incorporation ensures uniform distribution of catalyst throughout the filter walls, maximizing catalytic surface area while avoiding the formation of thick surface layers that would increase flow resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The catalytic material is integrated into the porous matrix of the filter walls, utilizing the existing pore structure to distribute the catalyst throughout the wall thickness. This approach provides extensive catalytic activity without adding significant material that would block gas flow, thereby maintaining low back pressure while achieving high catalytic effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Reliability

If a filtration layer is created on the walls of the flow channels by deposition of ceramic particles, then filtration efficiency is improved, but the filter becomes affected by liquid water

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration efficiencyVSAvoidfiltration functionality stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The filter substrate is made from a composite ceramic material combining multiple oxides (e.g., cordierite with alumina and silica) that provide both filtration capability and inherent hydrophobicity. This composite structure creates a surface energy that repels liquid water while maintaining porous structure for particle filtration, preventing water from blocking the filtration pores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The porous ceramic structure is designed with specific pore size, shape, and surface chemistry that inherently resist liquid water penetration. The pore structure allows gas molecules to pass through while the surface properties prevent liquid water from adhering and blocking the pores, maintaining filtration efficiency in wet conditions without requiring additional hydrophobic coatings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution achieves enhanced filtration efficiency with minimal increase in exhaust-gas back pressure and maintains filtration properties even after exposure to liquid water, ensuring robust performance across a wide range of operating conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a dry-coating process is used to apply a coating F on the surfaces OE

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDry-coating process: Deposition (physical)

Implementation Method 2

coating F comprises a sintered material S, wherein material S comprises an oxide, oxide-hydroxide, carbonate, sulphate, silicate, phosphate, mixed oxide, composite oxide, molecular sieve or a mixture comprising two or more of these materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS12270326B2Filter for the aftertreatment of exhaust gases of internal combustion engines
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 UMICORE AG & CO KG
  • US12270326B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a wall-flow filter for removing particles from the exhaust gas of an internal combustion engine, which comprises a coating F, which comprises a sintered material S, wherein material S comprises an oxide, oxide-hydroxide, carbonate, sulphate, silicate, phosphate, mixed oxide, composite oxide, molecular sieve or a mixture comprising two or more of these materials.