Distributed Wall Hold-Down Structure for Uplift and Wood Shrinkage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tension hold down systems in light frame and wood frame construction fail to effectively resist uplift and compensate for wood shrinkage, leading to instability and potential structural issues during storms, hurricanes, or earthquakes.

Innovation Solution

A hold down system comprising a tie-rod anchored to a concrete foundation, extending through openings in rigid members, with a slack absorber assembly that uses expansion devices and washers to maintain tension and distribute load, ensuring the tie-rod remains under tension and the wall is securely anchored.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional tension hold down system is used in light frame construction, then the system is simple in structure, but it fails to effectively resist uplift and compensate for wood shrinkage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplift resistanceVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hold down system is divided into multiple independent components including a first rigid member, second rigid member, tie-rod, first support, and second support. Each component performs a specific function, allowing the system to effectively resist uplift while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a single-point anchorage to a distributed loading system by spacing the first and second rigid members vertically apart and positioning supports in different lateral sections. This dimensional distribution enhances uplift resistance by spreading forces across multiple attachment points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If a hold down system with distributed loading is implemented, then uplift resistance and wood shrinkage compensation are improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tie-rod serves multiple functions: it connects the first and second rigid members, maintains tension loading, and transfers forces between components. The rigid members simultaneously provide structural support and distribute compression loading, reducing the need for additional specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines tension resistance and compression distribution functions into an integrated assembly where the tie-rod, rigid members, and supports work together as a unified structure. This merging of functions achieves high reliability while controlling overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the tie-rod is placed under tension loading through nut pressure, then uplift resistance is enhanced, but the compression loading on supports increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplift resistanceVSAvoidcompression loading on supports
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The compression loading is segmented and distributed to multiple supports positioned in different lateral sections rather than concentrated on a single support. This distribution reduces the stress burden on each individual support while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system distributes compression forces across both lateral sections by positioning the first support in the first lateral section and the second support in the second lateral section. This spatial distribution transforms a concentrated stress problem into a distributed loading system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively resists uplift and shear forces, compensates for wood shrinkage, and maintains structural integrity by distributing load across multiple expansion devices, ensuring the wall remains securely anchored and stable under various environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a nut threaded to the tie-rod, the nut exerting pressure on the second rigid member to place the tie rod under tension loading

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

the tension loading is transferred by the second rigid member to the first and second supports to subject the first and second supports to compression loading

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Implementation Method 3

causing the first rigid member to press on the horizontal member of the stud wall via the first and second lateral sections of the first rigid member, thus distributing the compression loading

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS20240044128A1Hold down system with distributed loading for building walls
Publication Date: 2024.02.08 CETRES HOLDINGS LLC
  • US20240044128A1 patent drawing
  • US20240044128A1 patent drawing
  • US20240044128A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A hold down system for a building wall comprises a first rigid member and a second rigid member, the second rigid member being vertically spaced apart from the first rigid member, the first rigid member is supported on a horizontal member of a stud wall, the first and second rigid members including first and second openings, respectively; a tie-rod with a lower end portion for being anchored to an anchorage, the tie-rod extending transversely through the first and second openings, the tie-rod dividing the first and second rigid members into a first lateral section on one side of the tie-rod and a second lateral section on a diametrically opposite side of the tie-rod; first support and second support disposed between the first and second rigid members, the first support being disposed in the first lateral section, the second support being disposed in the second lateral section, the tie-rod extending through the first and second rigid members outside of the first support or the second support; and a nut threaded to the tie-rod, the nut exerting pressure on the second rigid member to place the tie rod under tension loading, the tension loading is transferred by the second rigid member to the first and second supports to subject the first and second supports to compression loading, thereby causing the first rigid member to press on the horizontal member of the stud wall via the first and second lateral sections of the first rigid member, thus distributing the compression loading.