Wall-Mounted Shoe Holder with Adjustable Strap and Vertical Sizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shoe storage solutions fail to efficiently store different sizes of shoes, including high heels, on walls or flat surfaces, as they lack adjustability and secure mounting options, leading to cluttered spaces and difficulty in locating shoes.

Innovation Solution

A shoe holder organizer with an adhesive backing for secure wall or door mounting, a flexible strap for cushioning and size adjustment, and a vertical adjustment mechanism with finite stops to accommodate various shoe sizes, allowing for easy installation, removal, and visibility of stored shoes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If shoes are placed on the ground or in shoe boxes, then storage is simple, but shoes are difficult to locate and space is wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of locating shoesVSAvoidstorage space utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The shoe holder transitions storage from horizontal floor/box placement to vertical wall mounting, utilizing the vertical dimension to create additional storage capacity without occupying floor space. Multiple shoes can be stacked vertically on a single wall-mounted holder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The shoe holder is designed as a modular system with individual compartments for different shoe types (high heels, flats, boots) and adjustable elements, allowing shoes to be separated and displayed individually rather than stored in bulk boxes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed shoe holder design is used, then manufacturing is simple, but it cannot accommodate different sizes and types of shoes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of different shoe sizes and typesVSAvoidholder structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shoe holder incorporates adjustable elements including movable shelves, adjustable heel supports, and reconfigurable compartments that can be modified to accommodate different shoe sizes and styles, transforming a static structure into a dynamic, adaptable system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The holder is designed with universal features that allow it to store multiple types of footwear (high heels, flats, boots, sandals) through adjustable components and versatile compartment configurations, making a single holder suitable for diverse shoe collections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If adhesive mounting is used, then installation is easy and removable without residue, but mounting strength may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installation and removalVSAvoidmounting strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting system uses multiple discrete adhesive mounting points distributed across the holder structure rather than a single large adhesive area, allowing the holder to be securely mounted while maintaining ease of removal by targeting individual adhesive points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adhesive mounting surfaces are pre-prepared with optimized adhesive application areas and structural reinforcement at critical mounting points, ensuring sufficient mounting strength is achieved while maintaining the ease of removal characteristic of adhesive mounting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Quantity of substance

If multiple shoe holders are mounted to increase storage, then storage capacity increases, but wall space consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of shoes storedVSAvoidwall space used
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The shoe holder design incorporates nested or overlapping configurations where smaller holders can be positioned within or adjacent to larger holders, allowing multiple shoe storage units to be combined in a space-efficient manner that maximizes vertical utilization while minimizing horizontal wall space consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

By organizing holders in vertical stacks and utilizing depth dimensions, the system increases shoe storage capacity without proportionally increasing the horizontal wall footprint, effectively transitioning from two-dimensional to three-dimensional space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11659947B2Shoe holder organizer
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 MARTINEZ BERTHA STEPHANIE
  • US11659947B2 patent drawing
  • US11659947B2 patent drawing
  • US11659947B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improvements in a shoe holder organizer is disclosed that allows the shoe holder to be mounted onto a vertical wall or door. The shoe holder organizer has a hinged door that can be easily grasped to pull down the door and gravity holds the door open, and a securing tab holds the door in the closed position. A flexible strap is included that folds with the door to provide a soft and flexible cushioned member that adds padding to the shoe holder, so damage is not caused to shoes that are stored on the shoe holder(s). There is further a vertical adjustment member that alters a distance from a clamping surface to the strap. There are a number of finite stops to position and retain the vertical adjustment member onto the wall mount bracket.