Wall Reinforcement Using Constant Force Bias

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wall reinforcement methods fail to maintain a constant force against bowed subterranean walls as soil conditions change seasonally or over time, leading to potential beam instability and safety hazards.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus featuring a structural member with a bias, such as a coil spring, anchored to the building and extending to a force-applying device, which applies a continuous force to the wall, ensuring the member remains securely in place even as soil conditions change.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional wall reinforcement methods are used, then the wall is supported initially, but the force against the wall is not maintained when soil conditions change seasonally or over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce maintenanceVSAvoidduration of force application
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a dynamic biasing mechanism (spring or other biasing device) that automatically adjusts the force applied to the structural member as wall conditions change. The biasing device maintains continuous contact and force application, allowing the reinforcement system to adapt to seasonal soil changes and wall movement without manual intervention, thereby resolving the contradiction between initial support and sustained force maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The biasing device is configured to self-adjust and maintain force automatically without requiring external control or manual tightening. The spring or biasing mechanism naturally compensates for wall movement and soil changes, making the system self-regulating and eliminating the need for frequent manual adjustments, thus improving reliability over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual tightening is performed frequently to maintain force, then wall support is maintained, but time and labor are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce consistencyVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing device automatically maintains the required force against the structural member through its inherent mechanical properties (spring force, gas pressure, or other biasing mechanisms). This self-regulating system eliminates the need for frequent manual tightening operations, significantly reducing maintenance time and labor while ensuring consistent force application for reliable wall support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous force application through the biasing device, which maintains constant pressure or force against the structural member throughout operational cycles. This continuous action prevents wall movement and maintains reinforcement effectiveness without interruption, eliminating the need for periodic manual intervention and reducing overall maintenance time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Device complexity

If a structural member is used without a biasing device, then the apparatus is simpler, but the beam can become unsupported and fall over when wall force relaxes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus structureVSAvoidbeam stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing device provides dynamic stabilization to the structural member, automatically adjusting to maintain support as wall conditions change. The spring or biasing mechanism ensures the beam remains continuously supported and prevents catastrophic failure or beam collapse when wall force relaxes, accepting the necessary increase in device complexity as a trade-off for significantly improved reliability and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The biasing device acts as a preventive measure, continuously applying force to the structural member before wall failure or beam instability can occur. This prior cushioning effect ensures the beam remains supported even when external wall forces change, preventing the harmful outcome of beam collapse and protecting against property damage or injury.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus maintains a constant force against the wall, preventing beam instability and ensuring structural integrity regardless of soil contraction or expansion, eliminating the need for frequent manual adjustments.

Implementation Method 1

A bias, such as a spring, is interposed between the bracket and the structural member. The bias exerts oppositely-directed forces against the bracket and the structural member, and one of the forces has a component directed toward the wall in order to force the structural member toward the wall and support the wall.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7726093B2Wall reinforcement using constant force
Publication Date: 2010.06.01 NATIONWIDE REINFORCING
  • US7726093B2 patent drawing
  • US7726093B2 patent drawing
  • US7726093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wall support and reinforcing apparatus that applies a constant force on a structural support member, such as a steel I-beam, that is adjacent the wall. The apparatus includes a bias that is interposed between the building, or a bracket mounted to the building, and the structural member. Thus, the bias force is applied to straighten the wall at all times, thereby having the straightening effect and keeping the structural member from being displaced laterally due to complete release of all forces to the structural member.