Wall Securement Device Protrusion for Cargo Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cargo securing methods in ocean shipping containers are inefficient, particularly in preventing load shifting and do not meet international regulatory standards, leading to potential safety issues and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A wall securement device with a protrusion on its rear main surface, designed to attach to container corner posts, enhances ease of application and stability by transferring pulling forces effectively, allowing for secure lashing of heavy loads without hindering cargo space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional lashing points (D-rings) are used to secure cargo, then cargo can be secured against shifting, but the application process is time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo securing reliabilityVSAvoidapplication time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The wall securement device is divided into multiple leaves (at least two leaves with front and rear main surfaces), each capable of independently receiving straps through apertures. This segmentation allows for easier installation and adjustment while maintaining securement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protrusion on the rear main surface automatically engages with the corner post structure to provide self-positioning and self-locking functionality. The device self-adjusts to the corner post geometry, eliminating the need for complex alignment procedures during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Stability of the object's composition

If multiple lashing and anchor points are used to prevent cargo shifting, then cargo stability improves, but device complexity and installation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo stabilityVSAvoidsecurement device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functional elements (multiple leaves with apertures, protrusion for positioning, and attachment mechanism) are merged into a single integrated wall securement device. This consolidation provides multiple lashing points and stability features while simplifying installation compared to using separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The device serves multiple functions simultaneously: the leaves provide lashing points for straps, the protrusion provides positioning and locking, and the overall structure attaches to corner posts. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate devices needed while maintaining cargo stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If traditional securement devices are used, then cargo can be lashed, but ease of application and user-friendliness are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring effectivenessVSAvoidease of application
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The protrusion on the rear main surface automatically engages with the corner post structure to provide self-positioning and self-locking functionality. The device self-adjusts to the corner post geometry, eliminating the need for complex alignment procedures during installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The protrusion is pre-formed on the rear main surface to match the corner post geometry, so that when the device is approached to the corner post, the protrusion automatically aligns and engages with the corner profile, preparing the device for secure attachment before final tightening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Force

If securement devices are designed for heavy loads, then load capacity increases, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The wall securement device is divided into multiple leaves (at least two leaves with front and rear main surfaces), each capable of independently receiving straps through apertures. This segmentation allows for easier installation and adjustment while maintaining securement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11447059B2Method and system for securing heavy loads
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 CORDSTRAP
  • US11447059B2 patent drawing
  • US11447059B2 patent drawing
  • US11447059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The current invention concerns a device for securing a load in a container. In an embodiment of the current invention, such a device comprises a leaf having a front and a rear main surface, and an aperture extending between said main surfaces for receiving a strap, whereby said rear main surface comprises a protrusion. In a further aspect, the invention is directed towards a method for securing a load, which method employs such a device.