Automated Wall Spraying Gondola with Visual Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotically-operated painting and cleaning systems for building walls lack efficiency and stability, particularly in traversing wall surfaces and maintaining optimal operation amidst wind forces, requiring enhanced structural and performance capabilities.

Innovation Solution

An automated system comprising a carrier with a robotic mechanism, visual monitoring system, computing device, and controller that scans structural characteristics and profiles to independently control the robotic mechanism and spray nozzle for efficient and stable operation, using a carrier with options like aerial work platforms, boom lifts, scissor lifts, and gondola carriers with suction cups for secure adhesion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If large-sized carriers are used to accommodate painters and equipment, then the structural stability and support capability are improved, but the device complexity and wind susceptibility increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidcarrier structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual painting operations with an automated robotic mechanism that uses computer vision and control systems to perform spray painting. This substitution reduces the need for large structural carriers designed to support human workers and equipment, as the robotic system is more compact and can be supported by simpler carrier structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic mechanism is equipped with its own positioning and control systems, including visual monitoring and automated navigation capabilities. This self-service capability allows the system to operate autonomously without requiring complex carrier structures designed for human operation and supervision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If automated robotic mechanisms are incorporated to reduce carrier size, then the device complexity is reduced, but the capability to traverse wall surfaces efficiently deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier structureVSAvoidtraversal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic mechanism incorporates dynamic positioning capabilities with multiple degrees of freedom, allowing it to adapt its position and orientation as it traverses the wall surface. The system includes movable arms and joints that can adjust in real-time to maintain optimal painting positions, enabling efficient coverage despite the reduced carrier size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs visual monitoring systems and sensors that provide real-time feedback on the robotic mechanism's position, the wall surface characteristics, and painting progress. This feedback enables automated adjustment of traversal paths and painting parameters, maintaining high productivity with a compact carrier design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the robotic mechanism is made compact for easy movement, then the ease of operation is improved, but the stability under wind forces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement capabilityVSAvoidwind stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The carrier system incorporates counterweight mechanisms and balancing systems that compensate for the compact robotic mechanism's reduced inherent stability. These counterweights and active balancing systems provide the necessary stability against wind forces while maintaining the compact, easily movable design of the carrier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables quick, efficient, and stable painting and cleaning operations with reduced human intervention, minimizing time, cost, and labor by optimizing movement and adhesion, thus enhancing operational efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

wherein the suction cups are configured to selectively adhere with the wall of the building for positioning the gondola carrier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS11931754B2System for spraying a wall surface of a building and method therefor
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 ELID TECH INT PTE LTD
  • US11931754B2 patent drawing
  • US11931754B2 patent drawing
  • US11931754B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides an automated system for spraying a wall of a building. The automated system comprises a gondola mounted on the building, the gondola having a linear track disposed thereon, wherein the linear track is disposed horizontally with respect to the height of the building; a robotic mechanism slidably mounted on the linear track of the gondola, the robotic mechanism further having an end effector adapted to support a spray nozzle thereon; a visual monitoring system configured to scan structural characteristics and profiles of the wall; a computing device disposed in communication with the visual monitoring system and the robotic mechanism, wherein the computing device is configured to receive the scanned structural characteristics and profile of the wall from the visual monitoring system; and a controller communicably coupled to the computing device, the controller configured to independently control operation of respective ones of the robotic mechanism, and the spray nozzle according to the scanned structural characteristics and profiles of the wall.