Wallboard Joint Seismic Test Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pseudo-static test devices for seismic behavior of wallboard connection joints fail to accurately evaluate the seismic behavior of the connection joints between the wallboard and the frame, as they primarily focus on the whole frame system rather than the joints themselves.

Innovation Solution

A pseudo-static test device comprising ground anchor holes, a support frame with a steel beam and columns, and a test wallboard, where the support frame forms a four-point hinged or rigid connection structure to isolate the force application, allowing direct transfer of horizontal forces to the connection joints for accurate evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a steel-frame loading device is used to apply loads to the wallboard through the frame, then the whole frame system can be tested, but the seismic behavior of the connection joints cannot be accurately evaluated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracy of connection joint seismic behaviorVSAvoidtest device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test device segments the wallboard system into the connection joint component and the frame system. By using a support frame that is hinged at the bottom to ground anchors, the frame is isolated from bearing test loads, allowing the connection joint to be tested independently without the interference of frame structural response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection joint is extracted as the isolated test object. The support frame is designed to transfer loads directly to ground anchors without involving the frame's structural behavior, effectively taking out the connection joint from the whole frame system for dedicated testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If the frame and wallboard are together subjected to load, then the whole frame system seismic behavior can be studied, but the connection joint behavior is obscured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection joint behavior measurementVSAvoidtest setup simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system is segmented into independent functional components: the support frame for load application, the connection joint as the test specimen, and the ground anchors for load transfer. This segmentation allows the connection joint behavior to be measured precisely without being obscured by frame response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If conventional test devices are used, then the test setup is simple, but the seismic response of connection joints cannot be isolated and evaluated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic response evaluation of connection jointsVSAvoidtest device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support frame acts as an intermediary that transfers loads from the actuator directly to the ground anchors through hinged connections, without involving the frame's structural behavior. This intermediary structure enables precise isolation and evaluation of connection joint seismic response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11714025B1Pseudo-static test device and method for seismic behavior of connection joints of wallboard
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 CHENGDU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • US11714025B1 patent drawing
  • US11714025B1 patent drawing
  • US11714025B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pseudo-static test device and method for seismic behavior of connection joints of a wallboard. The device includes ground anchor holes, a support frame including a steel beam and two steel columns, and a test wallboard. A bottom plate of the steel beam is provided with at least two first connecting holes. A top plate each steel column is provided with a second connecting hole. A bottom plate of each steel column is provided with a third connecting hole. The bottom plate of the steel beam is provided with a connection joint assembly configured to hingedly or rigidly connect a top of the test wallboard to the steel beam. Each first connecting hole is connected to the second connecting hole through a flange assembly.