Digital Wallet Fraud Guard Agent for Early Transaction Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fraud detection mechanisms in electronic transaction systems are ineffective in preventing fraudulent transactions early on, as they typically evaluate transactions after they have begun, leading to exposure of transaction account information and compromised security.

Innovation Solution

A digital wallet fraud guard system that includes a mobile device-based agent and a transaction account provider data center service, which monitors transaction context data to provide real-time fraud threat assessments and alerts users through visual indicators, leveraging geolocation and big data analytics to assess and prevent fraudulent transactions before they occur.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If fraud detection is performed after transaction initiation, then transaction processing speed is maintained, but security and reliability deteriorate due to exposure of account information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing speedVSAvoidsecurity and reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary fraud risk assessment by analyzing transaction context data (geolocation, device ID, merchant information) before the transaction is fully initiated. The fraud guard agent evaluates potential fraud threats in advance and provides early warnings to users, preventing fraudulent transactions from completing while maintaining legitimate transaction flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The fraud guard agent acts as an intermediary between the transaction initiation process and the account verification system. It intercepts transaction context data, performs independent fraud risk assessment, and provides recommendations before the transaction proceeds to traditional fraud detection systems, thereby preventing exposure of sensitive account information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If traditional fraud detection mechanisms are used, then device complexity is minimized, but productivity decreases due to inability to prevent fraud early

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidfraud prevention effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fraud detection system is segmented into multiple independent components: a fraud guard agent on mobile devices that collects and preliminarily analyzes transaction context data, a communication channel that transmits data securely, and a fraud guard service that performs comprehensive risk assessment. This segmentation enables early fraud prevention while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fraud guard agent on the mobile device performs self-service by autonomously collecting transaction context data, evaluating fraud risk based on predefined criteria (geolocation anomalies, device ID mismatches, suspicious merchant patterns), and providing immediate warnings to users without requiring constant server intervention, thereby improving fraud prevention effectiveness while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230123759A1Digital wallet fraud guard
Publication Date: 2023.04.20 AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES CO INC
  • US20230123759A1 patent drawing
  • US20230123759A1 patent drawing
  • US20230123759A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of improving the operation of a transaction network and transaction network devices through use of a digital wallet fraud guard system are disclosed. A digital wallet fraud guard system may comprise various modules and engines, wherein the probability that a transaction is fraudulent may be evaluated for establishing better secured usage of transaction instruments. For instance, a triggered alert indication may visually indicate to an account user a fraud risk associated with a potential transaction prior to the exposure of the transaction instrument. In this manner, the transaction network more properly functions according to approved parameters by diminishing the risk of data loss and lessening the value of the transaction network as a target for fraud and thus network intrusions and disruptions.