WAN Flow Distribution Using Dynamic Load Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing load balancing strategies in communication networks are static and do not adapt to dynamic traffic flows, leading to load imbalances and resource contention, which violate Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and result in suboptimal resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

A method for distributing data flows across multiple networks by measuring network loads over a reference period, calculating target and adjusted proportions using machine learning, and minimizing distribution divergence to ensure optimal load balancing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static distribution strategies are used to simplify routing decisions, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to dynamic traffic patterns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting decision complexityVSAvoidadaptability to dynamic traffic patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic load balancing by continuously monitoring network load metrics and adjusting flow distribution in real-time. The system transitions from static ECMP hashing to a dynamic controller that adapts distribution proportions based on current network conditions, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the controller receives load information from network devices, processes this information, and adjusts flow distribution accordingly. This closed-loop feedback system enables the network to adapt to changing traffic patterns while maintaining manageable complexity through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If homogeneous multi-path routing (ECMP) is used to ensure equal cost paths, then routing fairness is improved, but load balancing effectiveness deteriorates due to fixed distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting fairnessVSAvoidload balancing effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the distribution parameter from fixed equal-cost hashing to dynamic proportions based on actual network load. The controller adjusts the proportion of flows directed to each network path based on real-time load metrics, maintaining fairness while improving load balancing effectiveness through parameter adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static ECMP to dynamic flow distribution where the controller continuously adjusts path selection proportions based on network conditions. This dynamic approach maintains routing fairness through controlled randomness while significantly improving load balancing by adapting to actual network capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If non-homogeneous multi-path routing is used to use more paths, then path utilization is improved, but distribution control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath utilizationVSAvoiddistribution control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements precise control through feedback mechanisms where the controller monitors actual flow distribution and network load, then adjusts distribution proportions to achieve target utilization. This feedback-based control maintains precision even when utilizing multiple paths with different characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between flow sources and network paths, centralizing the decision-making process. This intermediary coordinates flow distribution across multiple paths with different costs and capacities, maintaining precise control through centralized management while maximizing path utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If policy-based routing is used to direct flows to technical criteria, then flow distribution control is improved, but adaptability to heterogeneous traffic profiles deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow distribution controlVSAvoidadaptability to heterogeneous traffic profiles
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation to heterogeneous traffic by continuously monitoring flow characteristics and network conditions. The controller adjusts distribution strategies in real-time based on traffic profile variations, maintaining precise control while adapting to diverse application requirements and traffic patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes distribution parameters based on traffic profile analysis. The controller adapts hashing parameters, distribution proportions, and selection criteria according to observed traffic characteristics, enabling precise control that adapts to heterogeneous traffic profiles rather than applying fixed policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4167543B1Method for distributing data flows between wide area networks and communication system
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 THALES SA
  • EP4167543B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4167543B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4167543B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for distributing data flows in a communication system comprising separate networks coupled to switching equipment. The method comprises the steps: • obtaining (100) a target distribution of incoming flows between the networks; • measuring (102) the flows of the networks in order to calculate the effective load of the networks over a reference period; • obtaining (104) an incoming load in the networks over a period following the reference period; • obtaining (106) a persistent proportion α of flows whose propagation time in the networks is greater than the reference period; • estimating (108) a distribution setpoint comprising an adjusted proportion for each network; • distributing (112), according to the adjusted proportions, the incoming load between the networks via the equipment.