Warehouse Sorting Layout With Dynamic AGV Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing logistics operations face inefficiencies due to ineffective cooperation among automatic devices, leading to increased hardware costs and reduced efficiency in sorting and tallying cargo, especially in complex supply chains with varying consumer demands and network architectures.

Innovation Solution

A facility and method utilizing a warehouse with sorting zones, container reload stations, and robot autonomous guided vehicles (AGVs) dynamically adjust sorting modes based on order parameters to optimize vehicle movement and reduce idle times, enhancing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If multiple automatic devices are deployed to handle sorting and tallying operations, then the hardware capability is improved, but the cooperation efficiency deteriorates leading to increased idle time and reduced overall productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic device capabilityVSAvoidsorting operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the sorting mode (first mode with one sorting robot, second mode with multiple sorting robots) based on real-time order parameters and cargo characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the automatic devices to cooperate efficiently by selecting the optimal configuration for each specific sorting scenario, thereby resolving the contradiction between having multiple automatic devices and achieving high cooperation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (sorting mode selection) based on order parameters such as number of orders, cargo types, and destination requirements. By adjusting the sorting mode parameter, the system optimizes the cooperation of multiple automatic devices for different sorting scenarios, improving overall productivity while maintaining high automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If traditional fixed sorting modes are used, then the system structure is simple, but the adaptability to varying consumer demands and order scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting system structureVSAvoidsorting mode adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The sorting system transitions from fixed modes to dynamic selection between first and second sorting modes. The server automatically selects the appropriate sorting mode based on real-time order parameters, enabling the system to adapt to varying consumer demands while maintaining a relatively simple physical structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sorting system is designed with multi-functionality by incorporating both first and second sorting modes within the same facility. The same sorting zone and automatic devices can operate in different modes depending on the sorting requirements, making the system universally applicable to various order scenarios without requiring completely separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If robot AGVs continuously move to fulfill orders, then the shipping speed is improved, but the moving distance and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipping speedVSAvoidAGV movement time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The server performs preliminary calculation of the optimal sorting mode before the actual sorting operation begins. By pre-determining the best sorting approach based on order parameters, the system minimizes unnecessary AGV movements and optimizes the sequence of operations, thereby reducing time consumption while maintaining fast shipping speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from order parameters and sorting results to continuously optimize AGV routing and sorting mode selection. The server monitors the sorting process and adjusts the sorting mode based on real-time conditions, reducing redundant movements and improving the balance between shipping speed and time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12462218B2Facility and method for executing logistics operation
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 ALLY LOGISTIC PROPERTY CO LTD
  • US12462218B2 patent drawing
  • US12462218B2 patent drawing
  • US12462218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A facility for executing a logistics operation comprises a warehouse facility, comprising a level and a plurality of areas defined on the level. The areas comprise a sorting zone and a shipping zone in communication with the sorting zone. A plurality of container reload stations are fixedly arranged at a plurality of predetermined locations in the sorting zone. Each of the container reload stations comprise a sorting robot, and a plurality of first placing points and a second placing point located at a periphery of the sorting robot. A plurality of first robot autonomous guided vehicles are configured to respectively transfer inventory containers to the container reload station. A plurality of second robot autonomous guided vehicles are configured to respectively transfer order containers to be loaded. A server is communicatively connected to the sorting robot, the first robot autonomous guided vehicles, and the second robot autonomous guided vehicles.