Warehouse Task Queue Swapping to Cut Travel Time and Congestion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing warehouse management systems struggle with inefficient task assignments that do not account for real-time changes in the warehouse environment, leading to increased travel time and distance for workers, reduced efficiency, and potential congestion, while often limiting workers to either inbound or outbound tasks.

Innovation Solution

A computing system optimizes task assignments by swapping tasks between workers' queues to minimize travel time and distance, balancing computational load and efficiency, and considering dynamic changes in the warehouse state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If tasks are assigned to workers based on traditional methods, then task completion can be achieved, but workers spend significant time traveling between tasks and locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel timeVSAvoidtask completion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically reassigns tasks between workers based on real-time warehouse state changes, worker locations, and task priorities. Instead of static assignments, the system continuously evaluates and adjusts task allocations to minimize travel time and maximize productivity, allowing workers to be assigned tasks that are geographically close to their current position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of task assignment by considering multiple variables simultaneously including worker location, task location, task priority, warehouse state, and travel time. By optimizing the assignment parameters dynamically rather than using fixed rules, the system reduces travel time while maintaining high task completion efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If workers are designated to only complete inbound or outbound tasks, then task specialization is achieved, but workers spend significant time traveling between tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask assignment simplicityVSAvoidtravel time between tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables workers to perform multiple types of tasks (both inbound and outbound) rather than restricting them to a single task type. By making workers multi-functional and allowing dynamic task assignment across different task categories, the system reduces travel time while maintaining operational simplicity through centralized management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If task assignments are determined without considering real-time warehouse changes, then assignment processing is simpler, but assignments become outdated and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment system complexityVSAvoidwarehouse efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors warehouse state changes, worker progress, and task completion status, using this feedback to dynamically adjust task assignments. By implementing real-time feedback loops, the system maintains high warehouse efficiency without requiring overly complex manual management, as the automated system adapts to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If workers travel long distances between tasks, then all tasks can be completed, but congestion occurs and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion rateVSAvoidwarehouse congestion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically balances task distribution across workers based on their current locations and workloads, assigning tasks that minimize travel distances and avoid concentrating multiple tasks in the same geographic area. This dynamic load balancing reduces warehouse congestion while maintaining high task completion rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12547958B2Swapping task assignments to determine task selection
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 LINEAGE LOGISTICS LLC
  • US12547958B2 patent drawing
  • US12547958B2 patent drawing
  • US12547958B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are systems and methods for ordering item-movement tasks in storage facilities. Item-movement tasks are distributed amongst queues of operators in a first state of the queues. A first value indicating utilization based on the operators performing the queues in the first state is determined. A first task from a first queue is swapped with a second task from a second queue, forming a second state of the queues, such that the first queue to be performed by a first operator includes the second task and the second queue to be performed by a second operator includes the first task. A second value indicating utilization based on the operators performing the queues having the second state is determined. Based on determining that utilization is greater when the queues have the first state, the first task is swapped with the second task to revert the queues to the first state.