Warehouse Task Sequencing for Dynamic Plan Changes and Priorities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing warehouse management systems struggle to efficiently implement updates or changes to warehouse plans, leading to inefficient and disruptive warehouse operations due to complex changes that are often ad-hoc and difficult for workers to understand.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically detects changes in warehouse plans and execution, generates dynamic tasks, determines task priority, and schedules them efficiently, using ensembled techniques to enhance warehouse task execution and compliance with supply chain networks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If warehouse plans are updated frequently to respond to changing conditions, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity and difficulty of implementation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments warehouse plan changes into discrete, manageable tasks with specific priorities and sequences. Each change is broken down into individual task cards that can be independently managed and assigned, reducing the complexity of implementing frequent plan updates while maintaining adaptability to changing warehouse conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts task priorities and sequences based on real-time warehouse conditions and plan changes. The dynamic task sequencing engine continuously optimizes the order of tasks based on current priorities, making the system adaptable to frequent changes without increasing operational complexity through automated resequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If ad-hoc changes are implemented quickly, then responsiveness is improved, but productivity and operational efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresponsivenessVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of plan changes and pre-sequences tasks before implementation. By analyzing the impact of proposed changes and pre-determining optimal task sequences in advance, the system enables quick responsiveness to changes while maintaining productivity through structured, pre-planned execution rather than ad-hoc implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor task execution and plan changes in real-time. This feedback loop allows the system to quickly respond to new conditions by adjusting task sequences based on actual execution data, maintaining both responsiveness to changes and overall operational efficiency through continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If workers are provided with detailed change information, then understanding and compliance are improved, but the complexity of communication and training increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomplianceVSAvoidcommunication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments detailed change information into discrete, visual task cards that present information in manageable chunks. Each task card displays specific instructions, priorities, and sequences in a simplified format, improving worker understanding and compliance while reducing communication complexity by presenting information in standardized, easy-to-process units rather than complex detailed documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between plan changes and worker execution. It translates complex plan changes into simplified task instructions through the task sequencing engine, which mediates between the detailed planning phase and the execution phase by presenting workers with clear, prioritized task lists rather than complex change documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual analysis of plan changes is performed, then flexibility is improved, but time consumption and labor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service analysis of plan changes through automated detection and sequencing. The task sequencing engine automatically analyzes the impact of plan changes, determines affected tasks, and generates updated sequences without requiring manual analysis, thereby maintaining flexibility in responding to changes while significantly reducing time consumption and labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis processes with automated computational algorithms. The task sequencing engine uses computer-based algorithms to analyze plan changes, calculate task impacts, and generate optimized sequences, substituting manual analysis with automated systems that maintain flexibility while reducing time consumption and human labor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20260057324A1Warehouse Dynamic Sequencing and Task Prioritization
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 BLUE YONDER GROUP INC
  • US20260057324A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057324A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057324A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are disclosed for generating and scheduling warehouse tasks. The method includes identifying changes in a warehouse plan for a warehouse within a supply chain network, generating tasks based on the identified changes, determining a task priority of the generated tasks, generating a task schedule based on the determined task priority, and monitoring real time execution of the generated tasks according to the task schedule. The method further includes performing, in real time, dynamic re-sequencing and dynamic re-scheduling to account for a deviation from the schedule and detecting, in real time, an error and transmitting, in real time, one or more tasks to a mobile device to account for the detected error.