Warehouse Zoning Layout for Localized Downtime Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In traditional warehouse architectures with single open workspace floor plans, human operators face safety concerns when traversing active areas of automated mobile drive units, leading to potential shutdowns and decreased throughput due to mishaps and maintenance needs.

Innovation Solution

A customizable warehouse architecture is partitioned into zones based on area, inventory holders, and traffic patterns, with a server determining event criticality and initiating operations to minimize downtime by controlling vehicle and personnel movements across zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single open workspace floorplan is used to implement different warehouse functions, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but safety risks increase and productivity decreases due to potential shutdowns from mishaps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The workspace is divided into multiple independent zones, each capable of operating autonomously. When an event occurs in one zone, only that zone is affected while others continue normal operations, preventing complete shutdown and maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of repair

If human operators traverse active workspace areas for maintenance and cleanup, then ease of repair is improved, but safety risks increase due to interaction with automated mobile drive units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of repairVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Maintenance and operational zones are segmented from active automated zones. Human operators can access specific zones for repair without traversing the entire active workspace, reducing exposure to moving automated units while maintaining ease of repair.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an event monitoring and criticality determination system that acts as an intermediary between human operators and automated units. This system coordinates access and operations to ensure safety while maintaining operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If workspace operations are shut down completely when mishaps occur, then safety is improved by preventing accidents, but productivity decreases due to loss of time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The workspace is segmented into independent zones with isolated event effects. When a mishap occurs in one zone, only that zone shuts down while others continue operating, minimizing loss of time while maintaining safety through localized containment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically determines the degree of criticality for each event and adjusts the response accordingly. Not all events require complete shutdowns; the system adapts the operational response based on real-time assessment, reducing unnecessary downtime while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If automated mobile drive units operate in an active workspace, then productivity is improved through increased speed and throughput, but safety risks increase for human operators who must traverse the workspace

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The workspace is divided into zones where automated units operate in designated areas while human operators are restricted to specific zones. This spatial segmentation allows both productivity and safety to be maintained by preventing unnecessary interactions between humans and automated units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The event monitoring system and zone management system act as intermediaries that coordinate between automated units and human operators. This intermediary layer enables safe coexistence by managing traffic patterns, access permissions, and operational timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11269338B2Apparatus and method for warehouse zoning
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 GREY ORANGE PTE LTD
  • US11269338B2 patent drawing
  • US11269338B2 patent drawing
  • US11269338B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is an apparatus and a corresponding method for performing warehouse zoning and further monitoring the zoned warehouse. The apparatus includes circuitry that partitions a workspace into a plurality of zones based on an area of the workspace, and a number of transportation vehicles and a number of item racks that are to be deployed in the workspace. A location of each zone within the workspace is determined based on a location of a first type of station that is disposed outside the workspace. The apparatus determines for each zone, an area of the zone and receives a signal indicating occurrence of an event in one of the zones. Further, the apparatus determines a degree of criticality of the occurred event which indicates whether workspace operation in the zone can be continued, and initiates an operation at a timing that is based on the determined degree of criticality.