Autonomous Vehicle Warning Deployment Using a Tethered Rover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in deploying warning devices without human intervention, posing safety risks and inefficiencies, especially when they need to stop unexpectedly due to emergencies, as existing methods require human operation to set up warning devices like triangles or flares.

Innovation Solution

A warning device deployment system that includes a remote-controlled vehicle and warning devices housed in a deployment case attached to the autonomous vehicle, which can automatically deploy and retract warning devices at predetermined distances using a wire connected to the vehicle, allowing for remote or autonomous operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If warning devices are deployed manually by human operators, then the deployment can be performed with simple equipment, but the response time is delayed and human safety is compromised during emergency stops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment response timeVSAvoiddeployment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables autonomous vehicles to deploy warning devices automatically without human intervention. The controller detects emergency conditions and autonomously controls the deployment vehicle to position warning devices at appropriate distances from the stopped vehicle, making the system self-sufficient during critical moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A remote-controlled deployment vehicle serves as an intermediary between the autonomous vehicle and the warning devices. This intermediate platform carries and deploys the warning devices, allowing the main vehicle to remain stationary while a separate controlled unit handles the deployment task, resolving the conflict between rapid deployment and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If warning devices are deployed automatically using a remote-controlled vehicle, then deployment safety and timing are improved, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment reliabilityVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The warning device deployment system is segmented into distinct functional modules: a controller mounted on the autonomous vehicle, a separate remote-controlled deployment vehicle, and the warning devices themselves. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture by distributing functions across multiple independent units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The deployment vehicle is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a transport platform for warning devices and as a controlled unit that can navigate to appropriate deployment positions. This universal design reduces the need for specialized equipment and lowers overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If warning devices are deployed at predetermined distances automatically, then deployment precision is improved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment position precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is pre-programmed with predetermined distance values for deploying warning devices based on different emergency scenarios. When an emergency is detected, the system automatically retrieves and applies the appropriate pre-calculated distance, eliminating the need for complex real-time calculations and achieving high positioning precision through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical measurement and positioning mechanisms with electronic control and pre-programmed distance parameters. The controller uses electronic signals to guide the deployment vehicle to predetermined positions, substituting mechanical complexity with simpler electronic control systems that achieve equivalent or superior precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12090920B2Systems and methods for deploying warning devices
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 KODIAK ROBOTICS INC
  • US12090920B2 patent drawing
  • US12090920B2 patent drawing
  • US12090920B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for deploying warning devices for a vehicle. The vehicle can be an autonomous vehicle. A method of deploying warning devices for a vehicle includes deploying one or more warning devices from the vehicle, the one or more warning devices being coupled to a deployment vehicle. Deploying the one or more warning devices includes controlling the deployment vehicle. A system for deploying warning devices for a vehicle includes a deployment vehicle and one or more warning devices coupled to the deployment vehicle. The system includes a controller configured to deploy the one or more warning devices from the vehicle. Deploying the one or more warning devices includes the controller configured to control the deployment vehicle.