Warp Knit Elastomeric Fabric Balanced Stretch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing warp knit elastomeric fabrics face challenges in achieving balanced stretch and power characteristics, with prior art methods resulting in unbalanced stretch ratios and undesirable durability issues such as core retraction, slip back, and frayed edges, while also being costly due to the need for specialized weft insertion machines.

Innovation Solution

A method using a standard warp knitting machine with a rigid yarn on one guidebar, a small spandex yarn knit in on the second guidebar, and a large spandex yarn laid in on the third guidebar, creating a fabric with improved durability and balanced stretch characteristics without requiring expensive weft insertion machines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If large deniers of elastic yarn are used in raschel knit fabrics to achieve substantial power, then power characteristics are improved, but stretch ratio becomes unbalanced (5:1 warp to fill)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower characteristicsVSAvoidstretch ratio balance
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different denier elastic yarns in different locations (different guidebars) of the fabric structure. Specifically, it combines large denier elastic yarn (providing power) with small denier elastic yarn (providing stretch balance) in a multi-guidebar construction, allowing each region to contribute its specific property to the overall fabric performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If small deniers of elastic yarn are used in tricot constructed fabrics to achieve balanced stretch, then stretch balance is improved, but power characteristics deteriorate (minimal power generated)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestretch balanceVSAvoidpower characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the advantages of both large and small denier elastic yarns by combining them in a single multi-guidebar fabric construction. The fabric integrates small denier yarns (for stretch balance) and large denier yarns (for power) in different guidebars, achieving both balanced stretch and substantial power characteristics simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If weft insertion technique is used to achieve better durability and square performance, then durability and stretch balance are improved, but manufacturing cost increases (requires expensive weft insertion machine)

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent copies the desirable performance characteristics of weft insertion fabrics (durability and balanced stretch) using a different manufacturing approach. By using a standard warp knitting machine with a specific multi-guidebar construction combining knit-in and laid-in elastic yarns, it replicates the performance benefits of expensive weft insertion fabrics without requiring specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Ease of manufacture

If prior art warp knitting techniques are used, then manufacturing cost is reduced (standard machine), but durability characteristics deteriorate (core retraction, slip back, frayed edges)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoiddurability characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite material principles by combining multiple types of yarns (rigid inelastic yarn and elastic yarns of different deniers) in a multi-guidebar warp knitting construction. This composite structure, with specific stitch patterns interlocking the yarns, produces a fabric that exhibits improved durability characteristics including resistance to core retraction, slip back, and frayed edges, while still using standard warp knitting machinery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting fabric exhibits enhanced durability, balanced stretch, and desirable power characteristics, with optimal flex durability ratings even after multiple launderings, and is less bulky and cost-effective compared to traditional methods, while eliminating issues like core retraction and frayed edges.

Implementation Method 1

a small spandex yarn knit in on the second guidebar and a large spandex yarn laid in on the third guidebar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7555922B1Elastic fabric
Publication Date: 2009.07.07 EFA INC
  • US7555922B1 patent drawing
  • US7555922B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved elastomeric fabric that is knitted with three guidebars on a warp knitting machine including a non-elastic yarn that is knit in on the first guidebar, a first elastic yarn that is knit-in on the second guidebar, and a second elastic yarn that is laid-in on the third guidebar. The elastic yarn has a denier in the range from about 20 to about 105 and the second elastic yarn has a denier in the range from about 70 to about 560. The fabric provides improved durability and power characteristics. The fabric can also be constructed to have improved stretch characteristics such as substantially square stretch or unbalanced stretch with greater fill (width) stretch than warp (length) stretch.