Clothes Washer Energy Control for Utility Peak Demand Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current energy management systems for household appliances lack effective peak demand reduction methods, relying on simple on/off switching and failing to communicate efficiently with utilities using varying communication protocols, leading to high energy costs and inefficiencies during peak usage periods.

Innovation Solution

A modular energy management system that includes an ambient light sensor and timer to determine peak shaving modes, along with a Demand Side Management Module using various communication methods (PLC, FM, WiFi, ZigBee, etc.) to interface with Advanced Metering Infrastructure, allowing appliances to adjust energy consumption based on utility signals and user preferences, reducing peak demand without additional components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple on/off switching is used to control energy supply, then device complexity is reduced, but energy management effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidenergy management effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent modules: communication module (supporting multiple protocols), control module, sensor module, and execution module. This allows the system to achieve sophisticated energy management through coordinated simple actions of each module rather than requiring a single complex control unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-chilling the freezer compartment before peak demand periods and pre-heating the water heater before off-peak periods. This anticipatory control reduces the need for intensive energy consumption during peak pricing periods, improving energy management effectiveness without requiring complex real-time control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple communication protocols are implemented, then adaptability to different utility systems is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication protocol compatibilityVSAvoidcommunication interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single communication module is designed to support multiple communication protocols (PLC, WiFi, ZigBee, Bluetooth) simultaneously. This multi-functional module can adapt to different utility communication standards without requiring separate dedicated hardware for each protocol, thus improving adaptability while controlling complexity through code-level protocol selection rather than hardware multiplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If peak demand reduction is implemented, then energy cost is reduced, but productivity of energy supply is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy cost during peak periodsVSAvoidenergy supply efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic operation patterns where high-consumption functions (water heating, washing cycles) are scheduled during off-peak periods with lower pricing, while maintaining essential functions during peak periods. This periodic action reduces energy costs by shifting load timing rather than reducing total energy supply efficiency, as the appliance remains fully functional just at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Use of energy by moving object

If active control during peak periods is implemented, then energy savings are improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumption during peak periodsVSAvoiduser control simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system operates autonomously by receiving pricing signals from the utility, automatically determining optimal operation schedules, and executing control actions without user intervention. The system serves itself by making intelligent decisions about when to operate various functions based on real-time pricing information, thereby achieving energy savings while maintaining ease of operation through automated rather than manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8627689B2Energy management of clothes washer appliance
Publication Date: 2014.01.14 HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS INC
  • US8627689B2 patent drawing
  • US8627689B2 patent drawing
  • US8627689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A clothes washer is provided comprising one or more power consuming functions and a controller in signal communication with an associated utility. The controller can receive and process a signal from the associated utility indicative of current state of an associated utility. The controller operates the clothes washer in one of a plurality of operating modes, including at least a normal operating mode and an energy savings mode in response to the received signal. The controller is configured to change the power consuming functions by adjusting one or more of an operation schedule, an operation delay, an operation adjustment, and a selective deactivation of at least one of the one or more power consuming functions to reduce power consumption of the clothes washer in the energy savings mode.