Safety System Control for Waste Collection Vehicle Lifting Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing safety systems for waste collection vehicles often unnecessarily deactivate the automatic mode of lifting and tilting devices due to sensor malfunctions, posing risks to operating personnel and requiring manual operation, which is less efficient and safer.

Innovation Solution

A method that continuously monitors the sensor system's functionality, initiates operator checks through visual and acoustic alerts, and gradually deactivates the automatic mode if issues persist, ensuring safety by switching to manual operation if sensor malfunctions are not addressed, and employs redundant sensor systems to maintain operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the safety system deactivates the automatic mode upon sensor malfunction, then operator safety is improved, but operational efficiency and productivity deteriorate due to mandatory manual operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational mode based on sensor functionality. When sensors are malfunctioning, the system transitions from automatic to manual mode, but allows reversible deactivation after a defined period, enabling dynamic adaptation between safety and efficiency based on current sensor status

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic re-evaluation of sensor functionality with defined time periods and emptying cycle counters. After a sensor malfunction is detected, the system allows reversible deactivation after a specific number of emptyings or time period, creating a periodic opportunity to restore automatic mode if sensors are repaired or cleaned

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If the automatic mode is deactivated due to sensor malfunction, then safety risks are reduced, but the complexity of operation increases due to manual initiation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety risk reductionVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The operational complexity dynamically changes based on sensor status. The system automatically switches between automatic and manual modes, adjusting the operational complexity without requiring operator decision-making. This dynamic adaptation reduces the burden on operators while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the sensor system is continuously monitored and automatic mode is deactivated, then operator safety is improved, but device complexity increases due to monitoring mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously receives feedback signals from the sensor system to monitor its functionality. This feedback mechanism enables automatic detection of sensor malfunctions and triggers appropriate mode changes, providing continuous safety monitoring through a relatively simple feedback loop

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4464624A1Method for controlling a safety system
Publication Date: 2024.11.20 ZOLLER KIPPER GMBH
  • EP4464624A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4464624A1 patent drawing
  • EP4464624A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for controlling a safety system for a waste collection vehicle with a lifting and tipping device that can be operated in at least a manual and an automatic mode, with at least one sensor system for detecting the presence of persons in a working area of ​​the lifting and tipping device, such that the automatic mode can be interrupted as soon as the presence of a person is detected, comprising the following steps: a) checking the functionality of the at least one sensor system; b) initiating a measure suitable for prompting an operator to check the sensor system as soon as the check reveals that the sensor system is not functioning.