Waste Compactor Frame Design for Compact Cabinet Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing waste compactors are large and inefficiently utilize space, making them difficult to integrate into kitchens and other small areas without straining surrounding structures.

Innovation Solution

A compact waste compactor design featuring a frame with minimal protruding parts, a manual scissors mechanism compactor, and a sliding plane with telescopic slides, allowing for efficient compaction and easy integration into small spaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a traditional waste compactor design is used, then compaction function is achieved, but the device occupies excessive space and requires large cabinet installation area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompactor volumeVSAvoidinstallation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The compactor is nested within the sliding plane structure, with the compression mechanism integrated into the drawer assembly. The sliding plane itself forms part of the compactor housing, creating a nested configuration that reduces overall volume while maintaining full compaction functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The compaction mechanism utilizes the sliding dimension of the drawer by incorporating a compression spring that operates along the direction of drawer movement. This transforms the compaction function from requiring separate vertical space to utilizing the horizontal sliding dimension, reducing the footprint volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If a compact frame design is used, then space utilization is improved, but structural strength and stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe areaVSAvoidframe strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The frame utilizes composite construction combining wood panels with metal reinforcement elements and plastic components. This composite approach allows the frame to achieve sufficient structural strength with reduced material quantity and smaller cross-sectional area compared to solid wood or metal frames alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The frame is segmented into multiple functional zones with localized reinforcement only where structurally necessary (at mounting points and support locations). This selective reinforcement strategy reduces overall frame area while maintaining strength at critical locations through strategic placement of strengthening elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If protruding parts are removed for compact design, then ease of operation is improved, but access to internal components becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidcomponent accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The compression spring and related mechanical components are extracted as removable modules that can be accessed by detaching the sliding plane assembly from the main frame. This extraction approach allows maintenance personnel to service internal components without requiring disassembly of the entire compactor or protruding access panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sliding plane assembly incorporates dynamic access features where panels can be quickly removed or opened during operation to access internal components. This dynamic accessibility allows the frame to remain compact without permanent protruding access points, as components can be reached through temporary openings created during the sliding or removal sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The compact design allows for easy placement in kitchens and other small areas, efficient waste compaction, and reduced stress on surrounding structures, while maintaining a simple and versatile operation.

Implementation Method 1

a compression spring (112) arranged to act between the compression plate (102) and the bottom of the sliding plane (101)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP4163098B1Waste compactor
Publication Date: 2025.04.23 ENERCET OY
  • EP4163098B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1f
  • EP4163098B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4163098B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3d

AI summary

The invention relates to a waste compactor, which includes a frame (10), to which compaction equipment (11) and a sliding plane (12) are arranged for a waste bin (13). The frame (10) is essentially free of protruding parts and it is dimensioned to be smaller than the cabinet for installing the waste compactor in the cabinet.