Waste-Material Crash Cushion Composition for Custom Impact Barriers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing traffic barriers are made of non-sustainable materials like concrete, which are brittle, cannot be tailored for specific uses, and have a fixed shape, lacking customization options.

Innovation Solution

Sustainable crash cushions formed from waste materials like recycled tires, bound with a polyurethane binder, allowing for tailored density and shape to suit specific applications, with a maximum load rating of 25,000 pounds and MASH TL2 certification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional concrete materials are used for barriers, then structural strength is achieved, but sustainability and flexibility are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the material composition parameters of the barrier. Instead of using fixed concrete composition, the invention uses a polymeric composition with adjustable ratios of binder, aggregate, and other components. This allows the material properties (density, flexibility, strength) to be tuned by changing the compositional parameters, enabling both structural strength and customization capability to be achieved simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining multiple components (binder, aggregate, polymeric materials) to create a barrier with enhanced properties. The composite structure allows different materials to contribute their strengths - the binder provides cohesion, the aggregate provides structural framework, and the polymeric components provide flexibility and sustainability. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by achieving concrete-like strength with improved adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If uniform density material is used throughout the barrier, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but impact absorption and structural integrity cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidimpact absorption capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating regions of different densities and compositions within the barrier structure. The composition can vary from one region to another - for example, a denser aggregate-rich region for structural support and a more polymeric-rich region for impact absorption. This spatial variation in material properties allows the barrier to perform multiple functions simultaneously while maintaining reasonable manufacturing complexity through controlled mixing and placement procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If fixed shape barriers are manufactured, then production efficiency is improved, but adaptability to different applications is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidapplication-specific customization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the barrier shape and configuration adaptable rather than fixed. The modular design allows barriers to be assembled in different configurations, and the material composition can be adjusted for different applications. This dynamic approach enables the same basic manufacturing process to produce barriers suited for various applications (roadside, median, bridge rail) by changing mold configurations or assembly patterns, thus maintaining production efficiency while achieving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Strength

If brittle concrete is used for barriers, then load bearing capacity is achieved, but susceptibility to breaking during handling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing capacityVSAvoidhandling durability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the material's mechanical properties through compositional adjustments. By incorporating polymeric binders and flexible aggregates in appropriate ratios, the material transitions from brittle concrete behavior to more ductile, flexible behavior. This changes the stress-strain parameters, allowing the barrier to absorb handling impacts without cracking while maintaining load-bearing capacity through the composite structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sustainable barriers provide robust, flexible, and customizable solutions that withstand impacts, are less likely to break, and can be stacked for various applications, meeting safety standards while using eco-friendly materials.

Implementation Method 1

a polyurethane binder, allowing for tailored density and shape

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS20260078554A1Sustainable crash cushions
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 PRETRED INC
  • US20260078554A1 patent drawing
  • US20260078554A1 patent drawing
  • US20260078554A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A crash cushion is provided. The crash cushion includes a rigid structure and a pod. The pod is positioned within the rigid structure. The pod includes a waste material and a binder. The binder is mixed with the waste material and configured to bind the waste material to form the pod.