Wastegate Valve Articulation Limits to Prevent Turbo Trapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing wastegate valve systems in turbochargers face challenges in accurately controlling the degree of articulation due to manufacturing tolerances and differential thermal expansion, leading to potential valve trapping and reduced fluid flow efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of opposed corresponding limit areas on the valve member and support member, which restrict articulation by collision, allowing controlled movement and distributing wear forces, thereby maintaining precise articulation control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the valve member is allowed to articulate freely to accommodate manufacturing tolerances and thermal expansion, then the reliability of the wastegate system is improved, but the precision of articulation control deteriorates leading to potential valve trapping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of wastegate systemVSAvoidprecision of articulation control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces limit areas that define maximum articulation angles by colliding with corresponding limit areas on the support member. This changes the parameter of articulation freedom from unlimited to bounded, maintaining reliability through tolerance accommodation while preventing valve trapping by limiting excessive articulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the valve member is constrained to limit articulation to prevent valve trapping, then the precision of articulation control is improved, but the ability to accommodate manufacturing tolerances and thermal expansion deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of articulation controlVSAvoidability to accommodate tolerances
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating specific limit areas on both the valve member and support member that selectively constrain articulation only in extreme positions. The majority of the articulation range remains free to accommodate tolerances and thermal expansion, while only the boundary regions are limited to prevent valve trapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If the valve member articulates with large clearance to accommodate thermal expansion, then the adaptability to thermal conditions is improved, but the fluid flow efficiency deteriorates due to reduced sealing effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to thermal conditionsVSAvoidfluid flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by pre-positioning limit areas that will collide before excessive articulation can occur. This prevents the valve from articulating to positions where sealing effectiveness would be compromised, thereby maintaining fluid flow efficiency while still allowing sufficient clearance for thermal expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11441478B2Wastegate for turbine
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 CUMMINS LTD
  • US11441478B2 patent drawing
  • US11441478B2 patent drawing
  • US11441478B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A turbine comprises a turbine housing defining a turbine inlet upstream of a turbine wheel and a turbine outlet downstream of the turbine wheel; and a wastegate valve assembly comprising at least one movable valve member mounted on a movable support member within a wastegate chamber which communicates with the turbine inlet upstream of the turbine, and has one or more chamber outlets which communicate with an outlet of the turbine. The valve member is permitted to articulate slightly about the support member, with the amount of articulation in respective directions being limited by collisions between a respective limit point on a limit area on a rear surface of a sealing portion of the valve member and a respective limit point on limit area on a front surface of the support member.