Turbocharger Wastegate Control Integrator Windup Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing control systems for turbochargers with wastegates face limitations in actuating the wastegate valve outside certain pressure ranges, leading to integrator windup and degraded control, especially at low or high boost pressures, which results in oscillations and excessive overshoot.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves using the boost pressure generated by the turbocharger to actuate the wastegate, with the limits of the actuation range varying based on interrelationships between boost pressure, turbine inlet pressure, turbine outlet pressure, and atmospheric pressure, thereby freezing the integral term when the wastegate actuator is commanded outside these limits to prevent integrator windup.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the feedback control system uses an integral term for steady state tracking, then steady state accuracy is improved, but integrator windup occurs when the wastegate actuator commands do not have the desired effect, leading to oscillations and excessive overshoot

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteady state tracking accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system determines the actuation range limits before executing the feedback control, using these pre-determined limits to conditionally freeze the integral term. This preliminary setup prevents integrator windup from occurring in the first place when the system is operating outside the effective actuation range, while still allowing integral action to accumulate when within range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The integral term is made dynamic by conditionally freezing it based on the comparison between the desired wastegate position and the actuation range limits. The control system continuously monitors operating conditions and adjusts the integral term's behavior accordingly, transitioning between active integration and frozen integration states to maintain stability while preserving steady-state accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the wastegate actuator is commanded outside the actuation range, then the desired boost pressure control is achieved, but the wastegate valve cannot actually adjust beyond its mechanical limits, causing loss of control authority

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboost pressure control capabilityVSAvoidcontrol effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system takes preliminary action by determining the actuation range limits based on system pressures (boost pressure, atmospheric pressure, valve force) before attempting to command the wastegate. By predicting the effective range and conditioning the integral term accordingly, the system prevents the harmful effect of integrator windup before it can occur when commands exceed mechanical limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system uses feedback from multiple pressure sensors (boost pressure, atmospheric pressure, valve force) to continuously determine the effective actuation range. This feedback information is used to conditionally freeze the integral term, ensuring that control actions remain effective and reliable within the actual mechanical capabilities of the wastegate valve while maintaining desired boost pressure control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the predictability and controllability of the feedback control system by reducing integrator windup and maintaining effective control throughout a broader range of engine operating conditions.

Implementation Method 1

Engines may use a turbocharger to improve engine torque/power output density. In one example, a turbocharger may include a compressor and a turbine connected by a drive shaft, where the turbine is coupled to the exhaust manifold side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

the exhaust-driven turbine supplies energy to the compressor to increase the pressure in the intake manifold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbine: Turbine

Implementation Method 3

a first port coupled to boost pressure, a second port coupled to atmospheric pressure, and a valve configured to control the flow of exhaust gasses according to the wastegate duty cycle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS8572961B2Turbocharger control
Publication Date: 2013.11.05 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8572961B2 patent drawing
  • US8572961B2 patent drawing
  • US8572961B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various systems and methods for controlling a turbocharger of an engine via a wastegate are described. In one example, actuation of the wastegate is limited when outside a range, the limits of the range varying with boost pressure, turbine inlet pressure, turbine outlet pressure, and atmospheric pressure. In this manner, a tracking error may be reduced when controlling the boost pressure and using the boost pressure to actuate the wastegate in a boost-based wastegate configuration.