Wastewater Treatment Control for DO and Nitrate Set-Point Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

WWTPs are complex systems with nonlinear and time-varying features, featuring different dynamic response times and conflicting performance indices, making optimal control difficult to achieve, which affects operation efficiency and stability.

Innovation Solution

A cooperative optimal control system (COCS) is developed, utilizing a two-level performance index modeling method and a cooperative optimization algorithm to optimize set-points for dissolved oxygen (SO) and nitrate nitrogen (SNO), combined with a predictive control strategy to adjust blower and internal flow recycle pump operations based on real-time data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional control methods are used in WWTP, then the system operation is simple, but the control performance is poor due to conflicting performance indices and different dynamic response times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple hierarchical levels (upper level for strategic optimization, lower level for real-time control) to handle different time-scale performance indices separately. Each level addresses specific control objectives, allowing complex multi-objective optimization to be broken down into manageable segments that can be solved independently while maintaining overall system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A cooperative optimization algorithm acts as an intermediary between conflicting performance indices (effluent quality, energy consumption, operation cost). This intermediary layer processes multiple conflicting objectives and generates coordinated control signals that balance competing requirements, resolving conflicts without requiring direct confrontation between opposing control goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple performance indices are optimized simultaneously, then the effluent quality improves, but the operation cost increases due to conflicting objectives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffluent qualityVSAvoidoperation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes operating parameters (aeration rates, recycle flows, sludge wasting rates) based on real-time conditions and optimization results. By continuously adjusting these parameters through cooperative optimization, the system finds the optimal balance point where effluent quality requirements are met while minimizing energy consumption and operation costs, rather than maintaining fixed conservative settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control system transitions from static, fixed-setpoint control to dynamic, adaptive optimization. The cooperative optimization algorithm continuously recalculates optimal operating points based on changing conditions, allowing the system to adaptively balance effluent quality and operation cost in real-time, capturing transient opportunities for cost reduction while maintaining quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If real-time optimal control is implemented, then the system efficiency improves, but the computational complexity increases due to nonlinearity and time-varying features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computational task is segmented across different time scales and control levels. The upper level performs less frequent, more computationally intensive optimization for strategic decision-making, while the lower level handles real-time control with simpler, faster algorithms. This segmentation allows real-time optimal control to be implemented without overwhelming computational demands at any single level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations and predictions using data-driven models and historical data to anticipate optimal control actions. By pre-computing optimization results based on predicted future states and preparing control strategies in advance, the system reduces real-time computational burden while maintaining high efficiency and adaptability to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12421143B2Cooperative optimal control method and system for wastewater treatment process
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 BEIJING UNIV OF TECH
  • US12421143B2 patent drawing
  • US12421143B2 patent drawing
  • US12421143B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a cooperative optimal control system, firstly, two-level models are established to capture the dynamic features of different time-scale performance indices. Secondly, a data-driven assisted model based cooperative optimization algorithm is developed to optimize the two-level models, so that the optimal set-points of dissolved oxygen and nitrate nitrogen can be acquired. Thirdly, a predictive control strategy is designed to trace the obtained optimal set-points of dissolved oxygen and nitrate nitrogen. This proposed cooperative optimal control system can effectively deal with the difficulties of formulating the dynamic features and acquiring the optimal set-points.